An audit of operating room time utilization in a teaching hospital: is there a place for improvement?

ISRN surgery Pub Date : 2014-03-13 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/431740
George Stavrou, Stavros Panidis, John Tsouskas, Georgia Tsaousi, Katerina Kotzampassi
{"title":"An audit of operating room time utilization in a teaching hospital: is there a place for improvement?","authors":"George Stavrou,&nbsp;Stavros Panidis,&nbsp;John Tsouskas,&nbsp;Georgia Tsaousi,&nbsp;Katerina Kotzampassi","doi":"10.1155/2014/431740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim. To perform a thorough and step-by-step assessment of operating room (OR) time utilization, with a view to assess the efficacy of our practice and to identify areas of further improvement. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the most ordinary general surgery procedures, in terms of five intervals of OR time utilization: anaesthesia induction, surgery preparation, duration of operation, recovery from anaesthesia, and transfer to postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) or intensive care unit (ICU). According to their surgical impact, the procedures were defined as minor, moderate, and major. Results. A total of 548 operations were analyzed. The mean (SD) time in minutes for anaesthesia induction was 19 (9), for surgery preparation 13 (8), for surgery 115 (64), for recovery from anaesthesia 12 (8), and for transfer to PACU/ICU 12 (9). The time spent in each step presented an ascending escalation pattern proportional to the surgical impact (P = 0.000), which was less pronounced in the transfer to PACU/ICU (P = 0.006). Conclusions. Albeit, our study was conducted in a teaching hospital, the recorded time estimates ranged within acceptable limits. Efficient OR time usage and outliers elimination could be accomplished by a better organized transfer personnel service, greater availability of anaesthesia providers, and interdisciplinary collaboration. </p>","PeriodicalId":89400,"journal":{"name":"ISRN surgery","volume":"2014 ","pages":"431740"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/431740","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/431740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Aim. To perform a thorough and step-by-step assessment of operating room (OR) time utilization, with a view to assess the efficacy of our practice and to identify areas of further improvement. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the most ordinary general surgery procedures, in terms of five intervals of OR time utilization: anaesthesia induction, surgery preparation, duration of operation, recovery from anaesthesia, and transfer to postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) or intensive care unit (ICU). According to their surgical impact, the procedures were defined as minor, moderate, and major. Results. A total of 548 operations were analyzed. The mean (SD) time in minutes for anaesthesia induction was 19 (9), for surgery preparation 13 (8), for surgery 115 (64), for recovery from anaesthesia 12 (8), and for transfer to PACU/ICU 12 (9). The time spent in each step presented an ascending escalation pattern proportional to the surgical impact (P = 0.000), which was less pronounced in the transfer to PACU/ICU (P = 0.006). Conclusions. Albeit, our study was conducted in a teaching hospital, the recorded time estimates ranged within acceptable limits. Efficient OR time usage and outliers elimination could be accomplished by a better organized transfer personnel service, greater availability of anaesthesia providers, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Abstract Image

某教学医院手术室时间利用审核:有改进的地方吗?
的目标。对手术室的时间利用情况进行全面和循序渐进的评估,以评估我们的工作成效,并找出需要进一步改善的地方。材料与方法。我们回顾性分析了最常见的普通外科手术,根据五个时段的手术室时间利用:麻醉诱导、手术准备、手术持续时间、麻醉恢复、转移到麻醉后护理病房(PACU)或重症监护病房(ICU)。根据手术影响,将手术分为轻度、中度和重度。结果。总共分析了548例手术。麻醉诱导的平均(SD)时间为19分钟(9分钟),手术准备的平均(SD)时间为13分钟(8分钟),手术准备的平均(SD)时间为115分钟(64分钟),麻醉恢复的平均(SD)时间为12分钟(8分钟),转移到PACU/ICU的平均(SD)时间为12分钟(9分钟)。每个步骤花费的时间与手术影响成正比(P = 0.000),而转移到PACU/ICU的平均(SD)时间较不明显(P = 0.006)。结论。虽然我们的研究是在教学医院进行的,但记录的时间估计范围在可接受的范围内。有效利用手术室时间和消除异常值可以通过更好地组织转运人员服务、麻醉提供者的更多可用性和跨学科合作来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信