Perineal Distensibility Using Epi-no in Twin Pregnancies: Comparative Study with Singleton Pregnancies.

ISRN obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2014-03-27 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/124206
Juliana Sayuri Kubotani, Antonio Fernandes Moron, Edward Araujo Júnior, Miriam Raquel Diniz Zanetti, Vanessa Cardoso Marques Soares, Julio Elito Júnior
{"title":"Perineal Distensibility Using Epi-no in Twin Pregnancies: Comparative Study with Singleton Pregnancies.","authors":"Juliana Sayuri Kubotani,&nbsp;Antonio Fernandes Moron,&nbsp;Edward Araujo Júnior,&nbsp;Miriam Raquel Diniz Zanetti,&nbsp;Vanessa Cardoso Marques Soares,&nbsp;Julio Elito Júnior","doi":"10.1155/2014/124206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aims of this study were to compare perineal distensibility between women with twin and singleton pregnancies and to correlate these women's perineal distensibility with anthropometric data. This prospective cross-sectional case-control study was conducted among nulliparous women, of whom 20 were pregnant with twins and 23 with a single fetus. Perineal distensibility was evaluated in the third trimester by means of Epi-no, which was introduced into the vagina and inflated up to the maximum tolerable limit. It was then withdrawn while inflated and its circumference was measured. The unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare perineal distensibility in the two groups and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was used to correlate the pregnant women's perineal distensibility with their anthropometric data. There was no difference in perineal distensibility between the twin group (16.51 ± 2.05 cm) and singleton group (16.13 ± 1.67 cm) (P = 0.50). There was a positive correlation between perineal distensibility and abdominal circumference (r = 0.36; P = 0.01). The greater the abdominal circumference was, the greater the perineal distensibility was, regardless of whether the pregnancy was twin or singleton. </p>","PeriodicalId":73520,"journal":{"name":"ISRN obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"124206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/124206","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/124206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare perineal distensibility between women with twin and singleton pregnancies and to correlate these women's perineal distensibility with anthropometric data. This prospective cross-sectional case-control study was conducted among nulliparous women, of whom 20 were pregnant with twins and 23 with a single fetus. Perineal distensibility was evaluated in the third trimester by means of Epi-no, which was introduced into the vagina and inflated up to the maximum tolerable limit. It was then withdrawn while inflated and its circumference was measured. The unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare perineal distensibility in the two groups and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was used to correlate the pregnant women's perineal distensibility with their anthropometric data. There was no difference in perineal distensibility between the twin group (16.51 ± 2.05 cm) and singleton group (16.13 ± 1.67 cm) (P = 0.50). There was a positive correlation between perineal distensibility and abdominal circumference (r = 0.36; P = 0.01). The greater the abdominal circumference was, the greater the perineal distensibility was, regardless of whether the pregnancy was twin or singleton.

Abstract Image

使用Epi-no治疗双胎妊娠会阴扩张性:与单胎妊娠的比较研究。
本研究的目的是比较双胎和单胎妊娠妇女的会阴膨胀性,并将这些妇女的会阴膨胀性与人体测量数据联系起来。这项前瞻性横断面病例对照研究在未生育妇女中进行,其中20人怀有双胞胎,23人怀有单胎。会阴扩张性在妊娠晚期通过Epi-no进行评估,Epi-no被引入阴道并膨胀至最大可容忍限度。然后在充气时取出,并测量其周长。采用unpaired Student’st检验比较两组孕妇的会阴膨胀性,采用Pearson相关系数(r)比较孕妇的会阴膨胀性与人体测量数据的相关性。双胎组(16.51±2.05 cm)与单胎组(16.13±1.67 cm)会阴膨胀性差异无统计学意义(P = 0.50)。会阴膨胀率与腹围呈正相关(r = 0.36;P = 0.01)。无论是双胎还是单胎,腹围越大,会阴膨大越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信