The role of fascia iliaca blocks in hip fractures: a prospective case-control study and feasibility assessment of a junior-doctor-delivered service.

ISRN orthopedics Pub Date : 2014-03-04 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/191306
L Hanna, A Gulati, A Graham
{"title":"The role of fascia iliaca blocks in hip fractures: a prospective case-control study and feasibility assessment of a junior-doctor-delivered service.","authors":"L Hanna,&nbsp;A Gulati,&nbsp;A Graham","doi":"10.1155/2014/191306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hip fractures are common and the incidence is expected to increase. Systemic analgesics, often prescribed to relieve pain after hip fractures, have huge side effects and can delay surgery. We analyse the role and efficacy of alternative forms of analgesia like fascia-iliac blocks (FIB) and assess the feasibility of a service delivered by junior doctors. 104 consecutive hip fracture patients were prospectively recruited and equally divided into cases (patients receiving FIB) and controls (patients receiving systemic analgesia). Outcome measures included time of initial analgesia, total preoperative dose of analgesia, pain scores from admission to 24 hours preoperatively, and complications. The pain scores were significantly lower (P ≤ 0.05) in patients receiving FIB at 2 and 8 hours preoperatively. The timing of initial analgesia was also quicker in patients with FIB (25 compared to 40 minutes). FIB patients required fewer doses of systemic analgesia. The block was successful in 67% of patients. There were no complications. The implementation of EWTD, HAN, and shift-system and the reduction in the number of medical staff have increased the burden on emergency departments. This study demonstrates that FIB performed by junior doctors are not only safe and effective analgesia but also provide an opportunity for junior doctors to improve current clinical practice. </p>","PeriodicalId":89787,"journal":{"name":"ISRN orthopedics","volume":"2014 ","pages":"191306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/191306","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/191306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Hip fractures are common and the incidence is expected to increase. Systemic analgesics, often prescribed to relieve pain after hip fractures, have huge side effects and can delay surgery. We analyse the role and efficacy of alternative forms of analgesia like fascia-iliac blocks (FIB) and assess the feasibility of a service delivered by junior doctors. 104 consecutive hip fracture patients were prospectively recruited and equally divided into cases (patients receiving FIB) and controls (patients receiving systemic analgesia). Outcome measures included time of initial analgesia, total preoperative dose of analgesia, pain scores from admission to 24 hours preoperatively, and complications. The pain scores were significantly lower (P ≤ 0.05) in patients receiving FIB at 2 and 8 hours preoperatively. The timing of initial analgesia was also quicker in patients with FIB (25 compared to 40 minutes). FIB patients required fewer doses of systemic analgesia. The block was successful in 67% of patients. There were no complications. The implementation of EWTD, HAN, and shift-system and the reduction in the number of medical staff have increased the burden on emergency departments. This study demonstrates that FIB performed by junior doctors are not only safe and effective analgesia but also provide an opportunity for junior doctors to improve current clinical practice.

Abstract Image

髂筋膜阻滞在髋部骨折中的作用:一项前瞻性病例对照研究和初级医生提供服务的可行性评估。
髋部骨折很常见,而且发病率预计会增加。全身镇痛药通常用于缓解髋部骨折后的疼痛,但它有巨大的副作用,并可能推迟手术。我们分析了替代形式的镇痛,如筋膜髂阻滞(FIB)的作用和疗效,并评估了由初级医生提供服务的可行性。前瞻性招募了104例连续髋部骨折患者,并将其平均分为病例(接受FIB的患者)和对照组(接受全身镇痛的患者)。结果测量包括初始镇痛时间、术前总镇痛剂量、入院至术前24小时疼痛评分和并发症。FIB患者术前2、8 h疼痛评分明显低于对照组(P≤0.05)。FIB患者的初始镇痛时间也更快(25分钟比40分钟)。FIB患者需要较少剂量的全身镇痛。67%的患者阻滞成功。没有并发症。实施EWTD、HAN、轮班制,减少医护人员数量,增加了急诊科的负担。本研究表明,由初级医生实施FIB不仅是安全有效的镇痛,而且为初级医生改进目前的临床实践提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信