Patient choice for older people in english NHS primary care: theory and practice.

ISRN family medicine Pub Date : 2014-03-04 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/742676
Andrew J E Harding, Frances Sanders, Antonieta Medina Lara, Edwin R van Teijlingen, Cate Wood, Di Galpin, Sue Baron, Sam Crowe, Sheetal Sharma
{"title":"Patient choice for older people in english NHS primary care: theory and practice.","authors":"Andrew J E Harding, Frances Sanders, Antonieta Medina Lara, Edwin R van Teijlingen, Cate Wood, Di Galpin, Sue Baron, Sam Crowe, Sheetal Sharma","doi":"10.1155/2014/742676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the English National Health Service (NHS), patients are now expected to choose the time and place of treatment and even choose the actual treatment. However, the theory on which patient choice is based and the implementation of patient choice are controversial. There is evidence to indicate that attitudes and abilities to make choices are relatively sophisticated and not as straightforward as policy developments suggest. In addition, and surprisingly, there is little research on whether making individual choices about care is regarded as a priority by the largest NHS patient group and the single largest group for most GPs-older people. This conceptual paper examines the theory of patient choice concerning accessing and engaging with healthcare provision and reviews existing evidence on older people and patient choice in primary care. </p>","PeriodicalId":90191,"journal":{"name":"ISRN family medicine","volume":"2014 ","pages":"742676"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4041268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/742676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the English National Health Service (NHS), patients are now expected to choose the time and place of treatment and even choose the actual treatment. However, the theory on which patient choice is based and the implementation of patient choice are controversial. There is evidence to indicate that attitudes and abilities to make choices are relatively sophisticated and not as straightforward as policy developments suggest. In addition, and surprisingly, there is little research on whether making individual choices about care is regarded as a priority by the largest NHS patient group and the single largest group for most GPs-older people. This conceptual paper examines the theory of patient choice concerning accessing and engaging with healthcare provision and reviews existing evidence on older people and patient choice in primary care.

英国国家医疗服务体系初级保健中老年人的患者选择:理论与实践。
在英国国民医疗服务系统(NHS)中,病人现在可以选择治疗的时间和地点,甚至可以选择实际的治疗。然而,病人选择所依据的理论和病人选择的实施都存在争议。有证据表明,做出选择的态度和能力是相对复杂的,并不像政策发展所表明的那样简单。此外,令人惊讶的是,对于国家医疗服务体系中最大的患者群体和大多数全科医生眼中最大的群体--老年人--是否将个人选择医疗服务视为优先事项,几乎没有任何研究。这篇概念性论文探讨了患者在获取和参与医疗服务方面的选择理论,并回顾了有关老年人和患者在初级医疗服务中的选择的现有证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信