Venous drainage patterns in carotid cavernous fistulas.

ISRN radiology Pub Date : 2014-01-30 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/760267
Ayse Aralasmak, Kamil Karaali, Can Cevikol, Utku Senol, Timur Sindel, Huseyin Toprak, Huseyin Ozdemir, Alpay Alkan
{"title":"Venous drainage patterns in carotid cavernous fistulas.","authors":"Ayse Aralasmak,&nbsp;Kamil Karaali,&nbsp;Can Cevikol,&nbsp;Utku Senol,&nbsp;Timur Sindel,&nbsp;Huseyin Toprak,&nbsp;Huseyin Ozdemir,&nbsp;Alpay Alkan","doi":"10.1155/2014/760267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. The carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) is an abnormal arteriovenous communication and its drainage pathways may affect the clinic presentation and change treatment approach. We evaluated drainage patterns of CCFs by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and categorized drainage pathways according to their types and etiology. Materials and Methods. Venous drainage patterns of 13 CCFs from 10 subjects were studied and categorized as anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, and contralateral on DSA. Drainage patterns were correlated to types and etiology of CCFs. Diagnosis of CCFs was first made by noninvasive imaging techniques. Results. On DSA, traumatic CCFs were usually high flow, direct type while spontaneous CCFs were usually slow flow, indirect type. Bilaterality and mixed types were observed among the indirect spontaneous CCFs. In all CCFs, anterior and inferior drainages were the most common. Contrary to the literature, posterior and superior drainages were noted only in high flow and long standing direct fistulas. Contralateral drainage was not observed in all, supporting plausible compartmentalization of cavernous sinuses. Conclusion. Types, etiology, and duration of the CCFs may affect their drainage patterns. DSA is valuable for categorization of CCFs and verification of drainage patterns. Drainage pathways may affect the clinic presentation and also change treatment approach. </p>","PeriodicalId":90195,"journal":{"name":"ISRN radiology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"760267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/760267","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/760267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Purpose. The carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) is an abnormal arteriovenous communication and its drainage pathways may affect the clinic presentation and change treatment approach. We evaluated drainage patterns of CCFs by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and categorized drainage pathways according to their types and etiology. Materials and Methods. Venous drainage patterns of 13 CCFs from 10 subjects were studied and categorized as anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, and contralateral on DSA. Drainage patterns were correlated to types and etiology of CCFs. Diagnosis of CCFs was first made by noninvasive imaging techniques. Results. On DSA, traumatic CCFs were usually high flow, direct type while spontaneous CCFs were usually slow flow, indirect type. Bilaterality and mixed types were observed among the indirect spontaneous CCFs. In all CCFs, anterior and inferior drainages were the most common. Contrary to the literature, posterior and superior drainages were noted only in high flow and long standing direct fistulas. Contralateral drainage was not observed in all, supporting plausible compartmentalization of cavernous sinuses. Conclusion. Types, etiology, and duration of the CCFs may affect their drainage patterns. DSA is valuable for categorization of CCFs and verification of drainage patterns. Drainage pathways may affect the clinic presentation and also change treatment approach.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

颈动脉海绵状瘘管的静脉引流模式。
目的。颈动脉-海绵窦瘘(CCF)是一种异常的动静脉交通,其引流途径可能影响临床表现和改变治疗方法。我们通过数字减影血管造影(DSA)评估CCFs的引流模式,并根据其类型和病因分类引流途径。材料与方法。对10例患者的13个CCFs的静脉引流模式进行了研究,并在DSA上将其分为前、后、上、下和对侧。引流模式与CCFs的类型和病因相关。CCFs的诊断最初是通过无创成像技术进行的。结果。在DSA上,外伤性CCFs多为高流量直接型,自发性CCFs多为慢流量间接型。在间接自发性ccf中观察到双侧性和混合型。在所有CCFs中,前路和下路引流最为常见。与文献相反,只有在高流量和长期存在的直接瘘管中才注意到后部和上部引流。所有病例均未观察到对侧引流,支持似是而非的海绵状窦区隔。结论。CCFs的类型、病因和持续时间可能影响其引流模式。DSA对于CCFs的分类和排水模式的验证是有价值的。引流途径可能影响临床表现,也会改变治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书