Diagnostic Performance and Additional Value of Elastosonography in Focal Breast Lesions: Statistical Correlation between Size-Dependant Strain Index Measurements, Multimodality-BI-RADS Score, and Histopathology in a Clinical Routine Setting.

ISRN radiology Pub Date : 2014-03-09 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/396368
Lukas Ebner, Harald M Bonel, Adrian Huber, Steffen Ross, Andreas Christe
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance and Additional Value of Elastosonography in Focal Breast Lesions: Statistical Correlation between Size-Dependant Strain Index Measurements, Multimodality-BI-RADS Score, and Histopathology in a Clinical Routine Setting.","authors":"Lukas Ebner,&nbsp;Harald M Bonel,&nbsp;Adrian Huber,&nbsp;Steffen Ross,&nbsp;Andreas Christe","doi":"10.1155/2014/396368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective. To evaluate the diagnostic benefit of real-time elastography (RTE) in clinical routine. Strain indices (SI) for benign and malignant tumors were assessed. Methods. 100 patients with 110 focal breast lesions were retrieved. Patients had mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and, if necessary, MRI. RTE was conducted after ultrasound. Lesions were assessed with BI-RADS for mammography and ultrasound. Diagnosis was established with histology or follow-up. Results. SI for BI-RADS 2 was 1.71 ± 0.86. Higher SI (2.21 ± 1.96) was observed for BI-RADS 3 lesions. SI of BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were significantly higher (16.92 ± 20.89) and (19.54 ± 10.41). 31 malignant tumors exhibited an average SI of 16.13 ± 14.67; SI of benign lesions was 5.29 ± 11.87 (P value <0.0001). ROC analysis threshold was >3.8 for malignant disease. Sensitivity of sonography was 90.3% (specificity 78.5%). RTE showed a sensitivity of 87.1% (specificity 79.7%). Accuracy of all modalities combined was 96.8%. In BI-RADS 3 lesions RTE was able to detect all malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%, specificity 92.9%, and accuracy 93.9%). Conclusions. RTE increased sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer detection when used in combination with ultrasound. </p>","PeriodicalId":90195,"journal":{"name":"ISRN radiology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"396368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/396368","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/396368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the diagnostic benefit of real-time elastography (RTE) in clinical routine. Strain indices (SI) for benign and malignant tumors were assessed. Methods. 100 patients with 110 focal breast lesions were retrieved. Patients had mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and, if necessary, MRI. RTE was conducted after ultrasound. Lesions were assessed with BI-RADS for mammography and ultrasound. Diagnosis was established with histology or follow-up. Results. SI for BI-RADS 2 was 1.71 ± 0.86. Higher SI (2.21 ± 1.96) was observed for BI-RADS 3 lesions. SI of BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were significantly higher (16.92 ± 20.89) and (19.54 ± 10.41). 31 malignant tumors exhibited an average SI of 16.13 ± 14.67; SI of benign lesions was 5.29 ± 11.87 (P value <0.0001). ROC analysis threshold was >3.8 for malignant disease. Sensitivity of sonography was 90.3% (specificity 78.5%). RTE showed a sensitivity of 87.1% (specificity 79.7%). Accuracy of all modalities combined was 96.8%. In BI-RADS 3 lesions RTE was able to detect all malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%, specificity 92.9%, and accuracy 93.9%). Conclusions. RTE increased sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer detection when used in combination with ultrasound.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

弹性超声在局灶性乳腺病变中的诊断性能和附加价值:在临床常规设置中,大小依赖的应变指数测量、多模态bi - rads评分和组织病理学之间的统计相关性。
目标。目的:评价实时弹性成像(RTE)在临床常规诊断中的价值。评估良恶性肿瘤的应变指数(SI)。方法:回顾性分析100例乳腺局灶性病变110例。患者进行乳房x光检查(MG)、超声检查(US),必要时进行MRI检查。超声后进行RTE。用BI-RADS进行乳房x光检查和超声检查。通过组织学或随访确诊。结果。BI-RADS 2的SI为1.71±0.86。BI-RADS 3型病变SI值较高(2.21±1.96)。BI-RADS 4和5病变的SI(16.92±20.89)和(19.54±10.41)显著高于rads 4和5病变。31例恶性肿瘤平均SI为16.13±14.67;良性病变的SI为5.29±11.87(恶性病变P值为3.8)。超声灵敏度90.3%,特异度78.5%。RTE的敏感性为87.1%,特异性为79.7%。所有方法的综合准确率为96.8%。在BI-RADS 3病变中,RTE能够检测到所有恶性病变(敏感性100%,特异性92.9%,准确性93.9%)。结论。RTE与超声联合使用可提高乳腺癌检测的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书