Assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient values as predictor of aggressiveness in peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison with Gleason score.

ISRN radiology Pub Date : 2014-02-09 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/263417
Shayan Sirat Maheen Anwar, Zahid Anwar Khan, Rana Shoaib Hamid, Fahd Haroon, Raza Sayani, Madiha Beg, Yasir Jamil Khattak
{"title":"Assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient values as predictor of aggressiveness in peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison with Gleason score.","authors":"Shayan Sirat Maheen Anwar,&nbsp;Zahid Anwar Khan,&nbsp;Rana Shoaib Hamid,&nbsp;Fahd Haroon,&nbsp;Raza Sayani,&nbsp;Madiha Beg,&nbsp;Yasir Jamil Khattak","doi":"10.1155/2014/263417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. To determine association between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted imaging and Gleason score in patients with prostate cancer. Methods. This retrospective case series was conducted at Radiology Department of Aga Khan University between June 2009 and June 2011. 28 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer were included who underwent ultrasound guided sextant prostate biopsy and MRI. MRI images were analyzed on diagnostic console and regions of interest were drawn. Data were entered and analyzed on SPSS 20.0. ADC values were compared with Gleason score using one-way ANOVA test. Results. In 28 patients, 168 quadrants were biopsied and 106 quadrants were positive for malignancy. 89 lesions with proven malignancy showed diffusion restriction. The mean ADC value for disease with a Gleason score of 6 was 935 mm(2)/s (SD = 248.4 mm(2)/s); Gleason score of 7 was 837 mm(2)/s (SD = 208.5 mm(2)/s); Gleason score of 8 was 614 mm(2)/s (SD = 108 mm(2)/s); and Gleason score of 9 was 571 mm(2)/s (SD = 82 mm(2)/s). Inverse relationship was observed between Gleason score and mean ADC values. Conclusion. DWI and specifically quantitative ADC values may help differentiate between low-risk (Gleason score, 6), intermediate-risk (Gleason score, 7), and high-risk (Gleason score 8 and 9) prostate cancers, indirectly determining the aggressiveness of the disease. </p>","PeriodicalId":90195,"journal":{"name":"ISRN radiology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"263417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/263417","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/263417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Purpose. To determine association between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted imaging and Gleason score in patients with prostate cancer. Methods. This retrospective case series was conducted at Radiology Department of Aga Khan University between June 2009 and June 2011. 28 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer were included who underwent ultrasound guided sextant prostate biopsy and MRI. MRI images were analyzed on diagnostic console and regions of interest were drawn. Data were entered and analyzed on SPSS 20.0. ADC values were compared with Gleason score using one-way ANOVA test. Results. In 28 patients, 168 quadrants were biopsied and 106 quadrants were positive for malignancy. 89 lesions with proven malignancy showed diffusion restriction. The mean ADC value for disease with a Gleason score of 6 was 935 mm(2)/s (SD = 248.4 mm(2)/s); Gleason score of 7 was 837 mm(2)/s (SD = 208.5 mm(2)/s); Gleason score of 8 was 614 mm(2)/s (SD = 108 mm(2)/s); and Gleason score of 9 was 571 mm(2)/s (SD = 82 mm(2)/s). Inverse relationship was observed between Gleason score and mean ADC values. Conclusion. DWI and specifically quantitative ADC values may help differentiate between low-risk (Gleason score, 6), intermediate-risk (Gleason score, 7), and high-risk (Gleason score 8 and 9) prostate cancers, indirectly determining the aggressiveness of the disease.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

外周带前列腺癌侵袭性的表观扩散系数评估:与Gleason评分的比较。
目的。探讨前列腺癌患者弥散加权成像的表观弥散系数值与Gleason评分的关系。方法。本回顾性病例系列研究于2009年6月至2011年6月在阿迦汗大学放射科进行。28例活检证实的前列腺癌患者接受超声引导六分仪前列腺活检和MRI检查。在诊断控制台上分析MRI图像并绘制感兴趣区域。用SPSS 20.0软件录入数据并进行分析。ADC值与Gleason评分采用单因素方差分析比较。结果。在28例患者中,168个象限进行了活检,106个象限为恶性肿瘤阳性。89例证实为恶性的病变表现为扩散受限。Gleason评分为6的疾病的平均ADC值为935 mm(2)/s (SD = 248.4 mm(2)/s);Gleason评分为837 mm(2)/s (SD = 208.5 mm(2)/s);Gleason评分为614 mm(2)/s (SD = 108 mm(2)/s);Gleason评分为571 mm(2)/s (SD = 82 mm(2)/s)。Gleason评分与平均ADC值呈负相关。结论。DWI和特异性定量ADC值可以帮助区分低危(Gleason评分,6分)、中危(Gleason评分,7分)和高危(Gleason评分,8分和9分)前列腺癌,间接决定疾病的侵袭性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书