Usefulness of the bolus-tracking baseline scan for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in abdominal computed tomography: a feasibility study.

ISRN radiology Pub Date : 2013-04-27 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.5402/2013/147632
J Gossner, S Schäfer
{"title":"Usefulness of the bolus-tracking baseline scan for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in abdominal computed tomography: a feasibility study.","authors":"J Gossner, S Schäfer","doi":"10.5402/2013/147632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common pathology in western societies. Unenhanced computed tomography (CT) of the liver is a valuable tool in determining the presence of steatosis hepatis, but in most departments standard CT protocols of abdomen often do not include unenhanced scans anymore. In a small series of 22 patients the liver density was measured in the acquired low-dose baseline scan for bolus tracking and was compared to the measurement in a regular unenhanced CT scan of the upper abdomen. The mean difference between the unenhanced CT scan and the low-dose baseline scan was 3.4 HU (range 0.2-8.6 HU); the difference between these two scans was 5 HU or smaller in 82% of the patients. There was a significant difference between the two used CT scanners; this has to be kept in mind before implementing this approach into daily practice. All but one patient with fatty liver disease on unenhanced CT were diagnosed using the baseline scan. The baseline scan for bolus tracking may be useful for the diagnosis or in the followup of fatty liver disease. </p>","PeriodicalId":90195,"journal":{"name":"ISRN radiology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"147632"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4045524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/147632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common pathology in western societies. Unenhanced computed tomography (CT) of the liver is a valuable tool in determining the presence of steatosis hepatis, but in most departments standard CT protocols of abdomen often do not include unenhanced scans anymore. In a small series of 22 patients the liver density was measured in the acquired low-dose baseline scan for bolus tracking and was compared to the measurement in a regular unenhanced CT scan of the upper abdomen. The mean difference between the unenhanced CT scan and the low-dose baseline scan was 3.4 HU (range 0.2-8.6 HU); the difference between these two scans was 5 HU or smaller in 82% of the patients. There was a significant difference between the two used CT scanners; this has to be kept in mind before implementing this approach into daily practice. All but one patient with fatty liver disease on unenhanced CT were diagnosed using the baseline scan. The baseline scan for bolus tracking may be useful for the diagnosis or in the followup of fatty liver disease.

Abstract Image

在腹部计算机断层扫描中,剂量追踪基线扫描诊断肝脂肪变性的有效性:一项可行性研究。
非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)在西方社会是一种常见的病理。肝脏非增强计算机断层扫描(CT)是确定脂肪肝存在的一种有价值的工具,但在大多数部门,腹部的标准CT方案通常不再包括非增强扫描。在22例患者的小系列中,在获得的低剂量基线扫描中测量肝脏密度,用于丸跟踪,并与常规上腹部非增强CT扫描的测量结果进行比较。未增强CT扫描与低剂量基线扫描的平均差值为3.4 HU(范围0.2-8.6 HU);在82%的患者中,这两次扫描之间的差异为5 HU或更小。两种使用的CT扫描仪之间存在显著差异;在将这种方法应用于日常实践之前,必须牢记这一点。在未增强CT上,除1例外,所有脂肪肝患者均使用基线扫描诊断。基线扫描的丸剂跟踪可能是有用的诊断或在脂肪肝疾病的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书