Evaluation of the Potential Nephroprotective and Antimicrobial Effect of Camellia sinensis Leaves versus Hibiscus sabdariffa (In Vivo and In Vitro Studies).

Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Advances in Pharmacological Sciences Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-05-14 DOI:10.1155/2014/389834
Doa'a Anwar Ibrahim, Rowida Noman Albadani
{"title":"Evaluation of the Potential Nephroprotective and Antimicrobial Effect of Camellia sinensis Leaves versus Hibiscus sabdariffa (In Vivo and In Vitro Studies).","authors":"Doa'a Anwar Ibrahim,&nbsp;Rowida Noman Albadani","doi":"10.1155/2014/389834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Green tea and hibiscus are widely consumed as traditional beverages in Yemen and some regional countries. They are relatively cheap and the belief is that they improve health state and cure many diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential protective and antibacterial activity of these two famous plants in vitro through measuring their antibacterial activity and in vivo through measuring nonenzymatic kidney markers dysfunction after induction of nephrotoxicity by gentamicin. Gram positive bacteria like MRSA (methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus) were isolated from hospitalized patients' different sources (pus and wound) and Gram negative bacteria including E. coli and P. aeruginosa were used in vitro study. In addition, the efficacy of these plants was assessed in vivo through measuring nonenzymatic kidney markers including S. creatinine and S. urea. Green tea was shown antimicrobial activity against MRSA with inhibition zone 19.67 ± 0.33 mm and MIC 1.25 ± 0.00 mg/mL compared with standard reference (vancomycin) 18.00 ± 0.00 mg/mL. Hibiscus did not exhibit a similar effect. Both Hibiscus- and green tea-treated groups had nephroprotective effects as they reduced the elevation in nonenzymatic kidney markers. We conclude that green tea has dual effects: antimicrobial and nephroprotective. </p>","PeriodicalId":7389,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/389834","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Pharmacological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/389834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Green tea and hibiscus are widely consumed as traditional beverages in Yemen and some regional countries. They are relatively cheap and the belief is that they improve health state and cure many diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential protective and antibacterial activity of these two famous plants in vitro through measuring their antibacterial activity and in vivo through measuring nonenzymatic kidney markers dysfunction after induction of nephrotoxicity by gentamicin. Gram positive bacteria like MRSA (methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus) were isolated from hospitalized patients' different sources (pus and wound) and Gram negative bacteria including E. coli and P. aeruginosa were used in vitro study. In addition, the efficacy of these plants was assessed in vivo through measuring nonenzymatic kidney markers including S. creatinine and S. urea. Green tea was shown antimicrobial activity against MRSA with inhibition zone 19.67 ± 0.33 mm and MIC 1.25 ± 0.00 mg/mL compared with standard reference (vancomycin) 18.00 ± 0.00 mg/mL. Hibiscus did not exhibit a similar effect. Both Hibiscus- and green tea-treated groups had nephroprotective effects as they reduced the elevation in nonenzymatic kidney markers. We conclude that green tea has dual effects: antimicrobial and nephroprotective.

Abstract Image

茶树叶与芙蓉叶潜在的肾保护和抗菌作用的体内和体外研究
绿茶和木槿在也门和一些地区国家作为传统饮料被广泛消费。它们相对便宜,人们相信它们能改善健康状况,治愈许多疾病。本研究的目的是通过测定这两种著名植物的体外抑菌活性和体内庆大霉素诱导肾毒性后非酶肾标志物功能紊乱来评价其潜在的保护和抗菌活性。从住院患者不同来源(脓液和伤口)中分离革兰氏阳性菌MRSA(耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌),体外研究革兰氏阴性菌大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌。此外,通过测定S.肌酐和S.尿素等非酶肾标志物,在体内评价了这些植物的功效。绿茶对MRSA的抑制区为19.67±0.33 mm, MIC为1.25±0.00 mg/mL,而标准参比(万古霉素)为18.00±0.00 mg/mL。芙蓉没有表现出类似的效果。木槿组和绿茶组都有肾保护作用,因为它们降低了非酶肾标志物的升高。我们得出结论,绿茶具有双重作用:抗菌和肾保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Pharmacological Sciences
Advances in Pharmacological Sciences PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of experimental and clinical pharmacology, pharmaceutics, medicinal chemistry and drug delivery. Topics covered by the journal include, but are not limited to: -Biochemical pharmacology, drug mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology. -The design and preparation of new drugs, and their safety and efficacy in humans, including descriptions of drug dosage forms. -All areas of medicinal chemistry, such as drug discovery, design and synthesis. -Basic biology of drug and gene delivery through to application and development of these principles, through therapeutic delivery and targeting. Areas covered include bioavailability, controlled release, microcapsules, novel drug delivery systems, personalized drug delivery, and techniques for passing biological barriers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信