Negligence and embryo protection: a new frontier for medical law?

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
MEDICINE AND LAW Pub Date : 2014-04-01
Gianluca Montanari Vergallo
{"title":"Negligence and embryo protection: a new frontier for medical law?","authors":"Gianluca Montanari Vergallo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In early 2012, many embryos were destroyed in a Roman hospital because of the breakdown of the freezing machine. In such cases the biological damage, for instance by ovarian hyperstimulation, and the pecuniary damage, i.e. the costs of treatments, can be compensated if the plaintiff demonstrates that subsequent fertility treatments would not have been performed if the embryos had not been destroyed. The damage for pain and suffering can be compensated regardless of what would have been the outcome of the implant. Indeed, even in the case where the implant of cryopreserved embryos would not have been successful, the loss of embryos is suitable to cause pain and suffering because it violates the right to become a parent. Nevertheless, the proof of such damage is difficult to achieve. In order to impede that the negligent loss of embryos would remain without consequences it seems to be possible and appropriate to provide a crime to punish those who cause the death of embryos by negligence.</p>","PeriodicalId":54182,"journal":{"name":"MEDICINE AND LAW","volume":"33 1","pages":"2-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICINE AND LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In early 2012, many embryos were destroyed in a Roman hospital because of the breakdown of the freezing machine. In such cases the biological damage, for instance by ovarian hyperstimulation, and the pecuniary damage, i.e. the costs of treatments, can be compensated if the plaintiff demonstrates that subsequent fertility treatments would not have been performed if the embryos had not been destroyed. The damage for pain and suffering can be compensated regardless of what would have been the outcome of the implant. Indeed, even in the case where the implant of cryopreserved embryos would not have been successful, the loss of embryos is suitable to cause pain and suffering because it violates the right to become a parent. Nevertheless, the proof of such damage is difficult to achieve. In order to impede that the negligent loss of embryos would remain without consequences it seems to be possible and appropriate to provide a crime to punish those who cause the death of embryos by negligence.

过失与胚胎保护:医疗法的新前沿?
2012年初,在罗马的一家医院里,由于冷冻机器的故障,许多胚胎被破坏。在这种情况下,如果原告证明,如果胚胎没有被破坏,就不会进行后续的生育治疗,则生物损害(例如卵巢过度刺激)和经济损害(即治疗费用)可以得到补偿。无论植入的结果如何,疼痛和痛苦的损害都可以得到补偿。事实上,即使在冷冻胚胎植入不成功的情况下,胚胎的丢失也会造成痛苦和折磨,因为它侵犯了成为父母的权利。然而,这种损害的证据很难获得。为了防止因疏忽造成胚胎死亡而不产生后果,似乎可能而且适当地规定一项罪行,以惩罚因疏忽造成胚胎死亡的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信