Analysis for stress environment in the alveolar sac model.

Ramana M Pidaparti, Matthew Burnette, Rebecca L Heise, Angela Reynolds
{"title":"Analysis for stress environment in the alveolar sac model.","authors":"Ramana M Pidaparti,&nbsp;Matthew Burnette,&nbsp;Rebecca L Heise,&nbsp;Angela Reynolds","doi":"10.4236/jbise.2013.69110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Better understanding of alveolar mechanics is very important in order to avoid lung injuries for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for treatment of respiratory problems. The objective of this study was to investigate the alveolar mechanics for two different alveolar sac models, one based on actual geometry and the other an idealized spherical geometry using coupled fluid-solid computational analysis. Both the models were analyzed through coupled fluid-solid analysis to estimate the parameters such as pressures/velocities and displacements/stresses under mechanical ventilation conditions. The results obtained from the fluid analysis indicate that both the alveolar geometries give similar results for pressures and velocities. However, the results obtained from coupled fluid-solid analysis indicate that the actual alveolar geometry results in smaller displacements in comparison to a spherical alveolar model. This trend is also true for stress/strain between the two models. The results presented indicate that alveolar geometry greatly affects the pressure/velocities as well as displacements and stresses/strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":15173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering","volume":"6 9","pages":"901-907"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057278/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2013.69110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Better understanding of alveolar mechanics is very important in order to avoid lung injuries for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for treatment of respiratory problems. The objective of this study was to investigate the alveolar mechanics for two different alveolar sac models, one based on actual geometry and the other an idealized spherical geometry using coupled fluid-solid computational analysis. Both the models were analyzed through coupled fluid-solid analysis to estimate the parameters such as pressures/velocities and displacements/stresses under mechanical ventilation conditions. The results obtained from the fluid analysis indicate that both the alveolar geometries give similar results for pressures and velocities. However, the results obtained from coupled fluid-solid analysis indicate that the actual alveolar geometry results in smaller displacements in comparison to a spherical alveolar model. This trend is also true for stress/strain between the two models. The results presented indicate that alveolar geometry greatly affects the pressure/velocities as well as displacements and stresses/strains.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肺泡囊模型应力环境分析。
更好地了解肺泡力学是非常重要的,以避免肺损伤的患者进行机械通气治疗呼吸系统疾病。本研究的目的是研究两种不同肺泡囊模型的肺泡力学,一种是基于实际几何形状的肺泡囊,另一种是基于理想的球形几何形状的肺泡囊,采用流固耦合计算分析。通过流固耦合分析对两种模型进行分析,估计机械通风条件下的压力/速度和位移/应力等参数。流体分析的结果表明,两种肺泡的几何形状对压力和速度给出了相似的结果。然而,从耦合流固分析中获得的结果表明,与球形肺泡模型相比,实际肺泡几何形状导致的位移更小。这一趋势也适用于两个模型之间的应力/应变。结果表明,肺泡的几何形状对压力/速度、位移和应力/应变有很大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信