Barbed suture: a review of the technology and clinical uses in obstetrics and gynecology.

Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology Pub Date : 2013-01-01
James A Greenberg, Randi H Goldman
{"title":"Barbed suture: a review of the technology and clinical uses in obstetrics and gynecology.","authors":"James A Greenberg, Randi H Goldman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical knots are simply a necessary evil needed to anchor smooth suture to allow it to function in its role in tissue reapproximation. Surgical knots reduce the tensile strength of all sutures by thinning and stretching the material. The tying of surgical knots introduces the potential of human error and interuser variability. Knot-secured smooth suture must create an uneven distribution of tension across the wound with the higher tension burdens placed at the knots. Given the excessive relative wound tension on the knot and the reasonable concerns of surgeons for suture failure due to knot slippage, there is a natural tendency toward overcoming these concerns by over-tightening knots; however, tighter knots may be worse for wound healing and strength than looser knots. In minimally invasive laparoscopic surgeries, the ability to quickly and properly tie surgical knots presents a new challenge. In cases in which knot tying is difficult, the use of knotless barbed suture can securely reapproximate tissues with less time, cost, and aggravation. This article reviews the technology behind barbed sutures with a focus on understanding how they differ from traditional smooth sutures and how barbed sutures have performed in in vitro and animal model testing, as well as in human clinical trials. </p>","PeriodicalId":21170,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology","volume":"6 3-4","pages":"107-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4002186/pdf/RIOG006003_0107.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical knots are simply a necessary evil needed to anchor smooth suture to allow it to function in its role in tissue reapproximation. Surgical knots reduce the tensile strength of all sutures by thinning and stretching the material. The tying of surgical knots introduces the potential of human error and interuser variability. Knot-secured smooth suture must create an uneven distribution of tension across the wound with the higher tension burdens placed at the knots. Given the excessive relative wound tension on the knot and the reasonable concerns of surgeons for suture failure due to knot slippage, there is a natural tendency toward overcoming these concerns by over-tightening knots; however, tighter knots may be worse for wound healing and strength than looser knots. In minimally invasive laparoscopic surgeries, the ability to quickly and properly tie surgical knots presents a new challenge. In cases in which knot tying is difficult, the use of knotless barbed suture can securely reapproximate tissues with less time, cost, and aggravation. This article reviews the technology behind barbed sutures with a focus on understanding how they differ from traditional smooth sutures and how barbed sutures have performed in in vitro and animal model testing, as well as in human clinical trials.

带刺缝合:妇产科技术和临床应用综述。
手术结只是固定平滑缝合线的一种必要手段,使其能够发挥组织再贴合的作用。手术结会使材料变薄和拉伸,从而降低所有缝合线的拉伸强度。手术结的打结可能会造成人为错误和使用者之间的差异。打结固定的平滑缝合线必须在整个伤口上形成不均匀的张力分布,而打结处的张力负担较大。鉴于缝合结上的相对伤口张力过大,以及外科医生对缝合结滑动导致缝合失败的合理担忧,人们自然倾向于通过过度收紧缝合结来克服这些担忧;然而,较紧的缝合结可能比较松的缝合结更不利于伤口愈合和强度。在微创腹腔镜手术中,快速、正确地打手术结是一项新的挑战。在打结困难的情况下,使用无结倒刺缝合线可以安全地重新贴合组织,同时减少时间、成本和痛苦。本文回顾了有倒刺缝合线背后的技术,重点介绍有倒刺缝合线与传统平滑缝合线的区别,以及有倒刺缝合线在体外和动物模型测试以及人体临床试验中的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信