Long-term Treatment Effects of Lumbar Arthrodeses in Degenerative Disk Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Q Medicine
Andriy Noshchenko, Lilian Hoffecker, Emily M Lindley, Evalina L Burger, Christopher M J Cain, Vikas V Patel
{"title":"Long-term Treatment Effects of Lumbar Arthrodeses in Degenerative Disk Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Andriy Noshchenko, Lilian Hoffecker, Emily M Lindley, Evalina L Burger, Christopher M J Cain, Vikas V Patel","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000000124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review with meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To (1) evaluate long-term patient-centered clinical outcomes after lumbar arthrodesis with or without decompression for lumbar spondylosis (LS); and (2) compare these outcomes with those of alternative treatments, including nonsurgical and surgical which maintain mobility of the lumbar spine.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The effective treatment of LS is a complex clinical and economic concern for patients and health care providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>(1) randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing treatment effects of lumbar arthrodesis with other interventions; (2) participants: skeletally mature adults with lumbar degenerative disk disease.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and others. All years through February of 2013 were included. Patient-centered clinical outcomes before treatment, at 12, 24, or >24 months of follow-up, and rate of complications and additional surgical treatment were collected. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate pooled treatment effects. The GRADE approach was applied to evaluate the level of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 38 studies of 5738 participants. All studies showed strong or at least moderate treatment effects of lumbar arthrodesis at 12, 24, and 48-72 months of follow-up. The level of evidence was moderate at 12 and 24 months, and low at 48-72 months. The pooled long-term treatment effect of lumbar arthrodesis exceeded those of: nonsurgical treatment (P<0.0001) with a moderate level of evidence, and decompression without fusion (P=0.005) with a low level of evidence. The treatment effect of lumbar arthrodesis showed a small inferiority versus arthroplasty at 12 and 24 months of follow-up (P<0.001), but not after 24 months postoperative.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review indicates that surgical stabilization of the lumbar spine is an effective treatment for LS; in particular, for patients with severe chronic low back pain that has been resistant to ≥3 months of conservative therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","volume":"28 9","pages":"E493-521"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Objective: To (1) evaluate long-term patient-centered clinical outcomes after lumbar arthrodesis with or without decompression for lumbar spondylosis (LS); and (2) compare these outcomes with those of alternative treatments, including nonsurgical and surgical which maintain mobility of the lumbar spine.

Summary of background data: The effective treatment of LS is a complex clinical and economic concern for patients and health care providers.

Methods:

Selection criteria: (1) randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing treatment effects of lumbar arthrodesis with other interventions; (2) participants: skeletally mature adults with lumbar degenerative disk disease.

Search methods: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and others. All years through February of 2013 were included. Patient-centered clinical outcomes before treatment, at 12, 24, or >24 months of follow-up, and rate of complications and additional surgical treatment were collected. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate pooled treatment effects. The GRADE approach was applied to evaluate the level of evidence.

Results: The review included 38 studies of 5738 participants. All studies showed strong or at least moderate treatment effects of lumbar arthrodesis at 12, 24, and 48-72 months of follow-up. The level of evidence was moderate at 12 and 24 months, and low at 48-72 months. The pooled long-term treatment effect of lumbar arthrodesis exceeded those of: nonsurgical treatment (P<0.0001) with a moderate level of evidence, and decompression without fusion (P=0.005) with a low level of evidence. The treatment effect of lumbar arthrodesis showed a small inferiority versus arthroplasty at 12 and 24 months of follow-up (P<0.001), but not after 24 months postoperative.

Conclusions: This review indicates that surgical stabilization of the lumbar spine is an effective treatment for LS; in particular, for patients with severe chronic low back pain that has been resistant to ≥3 months of conservative therapy.

腰椎关节病在退行性椎间盘疾病中的长期治疗效果:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
研究设计:采用荟萃分析的系统评价。目的:(1)评估腰椎关节病(LS)合并或不合并减压后以患者为中心的长期临床结果;(2)将这些结果与其他治疗方法进行比较,包括维持腰椎活动能力的非手术和手术治疗。背景资料摘要:对于患者和医疗保健提供者来说,LS的有效治疗是一个复杂的临床和经济问题。方法:选择标准:(1)随机对照临床试验(rct)比较腰椎关节融合术与其他干预措施的治疗效果;(2)参与者:患有腰椎退变性椎间盘疾病的骨骼成熟的成年人。检索方法:Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library等。截至2013年2月的所有年份都包括在内。收集治疗前、12个月、24个月或24个月随访时以患者为中心的临床结果、并发症发生率和额外的手术治疗。进行荟萃分析以评估综合治疗效果。GRADE方法用于评价证据水平。结果:该综述包括38项研究,5738名参与者。所有研究在随访12、24和48-72个月时均显示腰椎融合术的治疗效果较强或至少中等。12个月和24个月的证据水平中等,48-72个月的证据水平较低。腰椎融合术的长期综合治疗效果超过非手术治疗(结论:本综述表明手术稳定腰椎是治疗LS的有效方法;特别是对保守治疗耐受≥3个月的严重慢性腰痛患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.16
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques features peer-reviewed original articles on diagnosis, management, and surgery for spinal problems. Topics include degenerative disorders, spinal trauma, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, metastatic tumor spinal replacements, management of pain syndromes, and the use of imaging techniques in evaluating lumbar spine disorder. The journal also presents thoroughly documented case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信