Rats respond for information: Metacognition in a rodent?

IF 1.3 4区 心理学
Chelsea R Kirk, Neil McMillan, William A Roberts
{"title":"Rats respond for information: Metacognition in a rodent?","authors":"Chelsea R Kirk,&nbsp;Neil McMillan,&nbsp;William A Roberts","doi":"10.1037/xan0000018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2 experiments, rats were trained to press a centrally located lever that delivered immediate food reinforcement and turned on a light signal that indicated the location of a further food reward. After rats learned to press the lever and use the light cue to find food, immediate reinforcement for lever pressing was discontinued. In Experiment 1, rats continued to press the lever for information about the location of reward in a T-maze, but control groups yoked to the experimental group for amount of reward, and conditioned reinforcement showed complete extinction of lever pressing. Rats tested on an 8-arm radial maze in Experiment 2 also continued to press a lever that did not yield immediate reinforcement but provided a light cue indicating which randomly chosen arm of the maze contained food; lever pressing declined significantly, however, when the same arm contained food on every trial. Comparisons of testing conditions between and within experiments suggested that probability of lever pressing increased as the amount of information gained increased. The comparative implications of these findings for metacognition are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":"40 2","pages":"249-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/xan0000018","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

In 2 experiments, rats were trained to press a centrally located lever that delivered immediate food reinforcement and turned on a light signal that indicated the location of a further food reward. After rats learned to press the lever and use the light cue to find food, immediate reinforcement for lever pressing was discontinued. In Experiment 1, rats continued to press the lever for information about the location of reward in a T-maze, but control groups yoked to the experimental group for amount of reward, and conditioned reinforcement showed complete extinction of lever pressing. Rats tested on an 8-arm radial maze in Experiment 2 also continued to press a lever that did not yield immediate reinforcement but provided a light cue indicating which randomly chosen arm of the maze contained food; lever pressing declined significantly, however, when the same arm contained food on every trial. Comparisons of testing conditions between and within experiments suggested that probability of lever pressing increased as the amount of information gained increased. The comparative implications of these findings for metacognition are discussed.

大鼠对信息的反应:啮齿动物的元认知?
在两个实验中,老鼠被训练去按一个位于中央的杠杆,这个杠杆会立即提供食物强化,并打开一个光信号,指示下一步食物奖励的位置。在老鼠学会按压杠杆并利用光线线索寻找食物后,立即加强按压杠杆的行为就停止了。在实验1中,大鼠在t迷宫中继续按压杠杆以获取奖励位置信息,而对照组则依附于实验组以获取奖励数量,条件强化表现为完全消除按压杠杆的行为。在实验2中,在8臂放射状迷宫中测试的大鼠也继续按下一个杠杆,这个杠杆不会立即产生强化,但会提供一个灯光提示,表明迷宫中随机选择的哪条手臂含有食物;然而,在每次试验中,当同一手臂含有食物时,杠杆按压明显下降。实验之间和实验内的测试条件比较表明,杠杆按压的概率随着获得的信息量的增加而增加。讨论了这些发现对元认知的比较意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
23.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition publishes experimental and theoretical studies concerning all aspects of animal behavior processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信