Metacognitive change as a predictor of outcome in cognitive therapy for psychosis.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Sophie Parker, Adrian Wells, Anthony P Morrison
{"title":"Metacognitive change as a predictor of outcome in cognitive therapy for psychosis.","authors":"Sophie Parker,&nbsp;Adrian Wells,&nbsp;Anthony P Morrison","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little known about predictors of response to cognitive therapy (CT) for psychosis. This study tests the hypothesis that metacognitive change at both end of treatment and follow-up is associated with positive outcomes in people with psychosis receiving CT.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients referred for CT for psychosis were offered CT over a maximum of 30 sessions. Assessments, including interview-based measures of psychotic symptoms and a questionnaire assessing metacognitive worry, were performed at pre-CT, post-CT and one-year follow-up. Data from 32 patients were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant positive relationships were found between metacognitive worry change scores at one-year follow-up and both positive symptoms of psychosis and particular dimensions of hallucinations. No significant relationships were found between metacognitive change and delusional symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that metacognitive change is associated with symptom change at followup. In particular, these benefits seem most evident in those people experiencing hallucinations. Methodological limitations and clinical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49288,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences","volume":"51 1","pages":"8-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is little known about predictors of response to cognitive therapy (CT) for psychosis. This study tests the hypothesis that metacognitive change at both end of treatment and follow-up is associated with positive outcomes in people with psychosis receiving CT.

Method: Patients referred for CT for psychosis were offered CT over a maximum of 30 sessions. Assessments, including interview-based measures of psychotic symptoms and a questionnaire assessing metacognitive worry, were performed at pre-CT, post-CT and one-year follow-up. Data from 32 patients were analyzed.

Results: Significant positive relationships were found between metacognitive worry change scores at one-year follow-up and both positive symptoms of psychosis and particular dimensions of hallucinations. No significant relationships were found between metacognitive change and delusional symptoms.

Conclusions: These results suggest that metacognitive change is associated with symptom change at followup. In particular, these benefits seem most evident in those people experiencing hallucinations. Methodological limitations and clinical implications are discussed.

元认知改变作为精神病认知治疗结果的预测因子。
背景:目前对精神病认知治疗(CT)反应的预测因素知之甚少。本研究验证了接受CT治疗的精神病患者在治疗和随访结束时的元认知变化与积极结果相关的假设。方法:对精神病患者进行最多30次的CT检查。评估包括基于访谈的精神病症状测量和评估元认知担忧的问卷,在ct前、ct后和一年随访期间进行。分析了32例患者的数据。结果:一元认知焦虑改变得分与精神病阳性症状和幻觉特定维度均呈显著正相关。元认知改变与妄想症状无显著关系。结论:这些结果提示元认知改变与随访时的症状改变有关。特别是,这些好处在那些有幻觉的人身上表现得最为明显。方法的局限性和临床意义进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: THE ISRAEL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY publishes original articles dealing with the all bio-psycho-social aspects of psychiatry. While traditionally the journal has published manuscripts relating to mobility, relocation, acculturation, ethnicity, stress situations in war and peace, victimology and mental health in developing countries, papers addressing all aspects of the psychiatry including neuroscience, biological psychiatry, psychopharmacology, psychotherapy and ethics are welcome. The Editor also welcomes pertinent book reviews and correspondence. Preference is given to research reports of no more than 5,000 words not including abstract, text, references, tables and figures. There should be no more than 40 references and 4 tables or figures. Brief reports (1,500 words, 5 references) are considered if they have heuristic value. Books to be considered for review should be sent to the editorial office. Selected book reviews are invited by the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信