Zucchelli's technique or tunnel technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of multiple gingival recessions.

Chanchal Bherwani, Anita Kulloli, Rahul Kathariya, Sharath Shetty, Priyanka Agrawal, Dnyaneshwari Gujar, Ankit Desai
{"title":"Zucchelli's technique or tunnel technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of multiple gingival recessions.","authors":"Chanchal Bherwani,&nbsp;Anita Kulloli,&nbsp;Rahul Kathariya,&nbsp;Sharath Shetty,&nbsp;Priyanka Agrawal,&nbsp;Dnyaneshwari Gujar,&nbsp;Ankit Desai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gingival recession is both unpleasant and unesthetic. Meeting the esthetic and functional demands of patients with multiple gingival recessions remains a major therapeutic challenge. We compared the clinical effectiveness of Zucchelli's technique and tunnel technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SECTG) for multiple gingival recessions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty systemically and periodontally healthy subjects having 75 recession defects (Miller's class I or II, 39 test and 36 control sites) were included. After initial nonsurgical therapy, test sites were treated with Zucchelli's technique and control sites with tunnel technique with SECTG. Plaque index, bleeding index, pocket depth, recession depth, clinical attachment level, and keratinized gingiva height were evaluated at baseline, 3 and 6 months post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean root coverage was 89.33% +/- 14.47% and 80.00% +/- 15.39% in the test and control groups respectively, with no significant difference between groups. Statistically significant root coverage was obtained for 82.50% +/- 23.72% and 71.40% +/- 20.93% of defects in the test and control groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Zucchelli's technique is effective for the treatment of multiple adjacent recessions in terms of both root coverage and keratinized tissue gain, irrespective of the number of defects. Moreover, this technique does not require an additional surgical site as required in the gold standard SECTG.</p>","PeriodicalId":17281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gingival recession is both unpleasant and unesthetic. Meeting the esthetic and functional demands of patients with multiple gingival recessions remains a major therapeutic challenge. We compared the clinical effectiveness of Zucchelli's technique and tunnel technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SECTG) for multiple gingival recessions.

Methods: Twenty systemically and periodontally healthy subjects having 75 recession defects (Miller's class I or II, 39 test and 36 control sites) were included. After initial nonsurgical therapy, test sites were treated with Zucchelli's technique and control sites with tunnel technique with SECTG. Plaque index, bleeding index, pocket depth, recession depth, clinical attachment level, and keratinized gingiva height were evaluated at baseline, 3 and 6 months post-surgery.

Results: The mean root coverage was 89.33% +/- 14.47% and 80.00% +/- 15.39% in the test and control groups respectively, with no significant difference between groups. Statistically significant root coverage was obtained for 82.50% +/- 23.72% and 71.40% +/- 20.93% of defects in the test and control groups, respectively.

Conclusion: Zucchelli's technique is effective for the treatment of multiple adjacent recessions in terms of both root coverage and keratinized tissue gain, irrespective of the number of defects. Moreover, this technique does not require an additional surgical site as required in the gold standard SECTG.

祖切利技术或隧道技术联合上皮下结缔组织移植治疗多发性牙龈萎缩。
背景:牙龈萎缩既令人不愉快又不美观。满足多发性牙龈衰退患者的审美和功能需求仍然是一个主要的治疗挑战。我们比较了Zucchelli技术和隧道技术与上皮下结缔组织移植(SECTG)治疗多发性牙龈衰退的临床效果。方法:系统和牙周健康的受试者20例,75例退行性缺损(Miller'sⅰ或ⅱ类,39个试验点和36个对照点)。在最初的非手术治疗后,试验部位采用Zucchelli技术,对照部位采用SECTG隧道技术。在基线、术后3个月和6个月评估牙菌斑指数、出血指数、牙袋深度、凹陷深度、临床附着水平和角化牙龈高度。结果:试验组和对照组的平均根盖度分别为89.33% +/- 14.47%和80.00% +/- 15.39%,组间差异无统计学意义。在试验组和对照组中,缺陷的根覆盖率分别为82.50% +/- 23.72%和71.40% +/- 20.93%,具有统计学意义。结论:无论缺损数量多少,Zucchelli技术在根盖度和角化组织增益方面均可有效治疗多个相邻的衰退。此外,该技术不需要像黄金标准SECTG那样需要额外的手术部位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信