Clinical reasons for returning hearing aids.

Korean journal of audiology Pub Date : 2014-04-01 Epub Date: 2014-04-14 DOI:10.7874/kja.2014.18.1.8
Ju Young Hong, In-Hwan Oh, Tae Suk Jung, Tae Hyun Kim, Ho Min Kang, Seung Geun Yeo
{"title":"Clinical reasons for returning hearing aids.","authors":"Ju Young Hong,&nbsp;In-Hwan Oh,&nbsp;Tae Suk Jung,&nbsp;Tae Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Ho Min Kang,&nbsp;Seung Geun Yeo","doi":"10.7874/kja.2014.18.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Increases in older aged populations and exposure to complicated noise environments have increased the number of hearing-impaired patients, creating greater demands for hearing aids. We have assessed the reasons that individuals rejected wearing and returned properly prescribed hearing aids, as well as differences in individual factors between younger and elderly adults.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Of 1138 patients for whom hearing aids were prescribed at Kyung Hee University Medical Center Hearing Aid Clinic, 81 (6.14%) returned their hearing aids, including 36 patients aged <65 years and 45 aged ≥65 years. Patient-related, hearing-related, and hearing aid-related factors were assessed by retrospective chart analysis and phone survey and compared in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary symptoms reported by the 81 patients who returned their hearing aids were hearing disturbance, ringing, and fullness in the ear, in that order and in both groups. The rate of hearing aid return was similar in elderly females and males (p=0.288). The spondee recognition threshold was significantly higher in younger than in elderly adults (63.3±14.0 dB vs. 55.6±14.74 dB, p=0.019), but the hearing aid return rate was highest in patients with moderate hearing loss in both groups. In evaluating the reasons for return of hearing aids, we found that ineffectiveness of the device was the most frequent reason, accounting for 32.0% of returns, the highest percentage in both groups, with the most frequent patient problem caused by management difficulty in elderly and financial difficulty in younger adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reasons for hearing aid return were different in two groups. Financial considerations were cited more by younger adults, while difficulties in managing hearing aids were cited more frequently by elderly adults. Patients in both groups, however, reported that the most frequent reasons for return were inadequate hearing improvement and inconvenience wearing the hearing aid due to noise amplification.</p>","PeriodicalId":90252,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of audiology","volume":"18 1","pages":"8-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/91/kja-18-8.PMC4003737.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7874/kja.2014.18.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background and objectives: Increases in older aged populations and exposure to complicated noise environments have increased the number of hearing-impaired patients, creating greater demands for hearing aids. We have assessed the reasons that individuals rejected wearing and returned properly prescribed hearing aids, as well as differences in individual factors between younger and elderly adults.

Subjects and methods: Of 1138 patients for whom hearing aids were prescribed at Kyung Hee University Medical Center Hearing Aid Clinic, 81 (6.14%) returned their hearing aids, including 36 patients aged <65 years and 45 aged ≥65 years. Patient-related, hearing-related, and hearing aid-related factors were assessed by retrospective chart analysis and phone survey and compared in the two groups.

Results: The primary symptoms reported by the 81 patients who returned their hearing aids were hearing disturbance, ringing, and fullness in the ear, in that order and in both groups. The rate of hearing aid return was similar in elderly females and males (p=0.288). The spondee recognition threshold was significantly higher in younger than in elderly adults (63.3±14.0 dB vs. 55.6±14.74 dB, p=0.019), but the hearing aid return rate was highest in patients with moderate hearing loss in both groups. In evaluating the reasons for return of hearing aids, we found that ineffectiveness of the device was the most frequent reason, accounting for 32.0% of returns, the highest percentage in both groups, with the most frequent patient problem caused by management difficulty in elderly and financial difficulty in younger adults.

Conclusions: The reasons for hearing aid return were different in two groups. Financial considerations were cited more by younger adults, while difficulties in managing hearing aids were cited more frequently by elderly adults. Patients in both groups, however, reported that the most frequent reasons for return were inadequate hearing improvement and inconvenience wearing the hearing aid due to noise amplification.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

退回助听器的临床原因。
背景与目的:老年人口的增加和复杂噪声环境的暴露增加了听力受损患者的数量,对助听器的需求也随之增加。我们已经评估了个人拒绝佩戴并返回适当规定的助听器的原因,以及年轻人和老年人之间个人因素的差异。对象和方法:在庆熙大学医学中心助听器门诊使用助听器的1138例患者中,81例(6.14%)归还了助听器,其中36例为老年人。结果:81例归还助听器的患者报告的主要症状依次为听力障碍、耳鸣和耳内充血,两组患者均如此。老年女性和男性的助听器归还率相似(p=0.288)。年轻人的自发性识别阈值明显高于老年人(63.3±14.0 dB比55.6±14.74 dB, p=0.019),但两组中度听力损失患者的助听器归还率最高。在评估助听器退货的原因时,我们发现助听器无效是最常见的原因,占退货的32.0%,两组中比例最高,老年人最常见的患者问题是管理困难,年轻人最常见的患者问题是经济困难。结论:两组患者退换助听器的原因不同。年轻人更多地提到了经济方面的考虑,而老年人更多地提到了管理助听器的困难。然而,两组患者报告最常见的原因是听力改善不足和由于噪音放大而不方便佩戴助听器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信