Facial fracture management in northwest Nigeria.

Abdurrazaq Olanrewaju Taiwo, Olujide Oladele Soyele, Ndubuizi Ugochukwu Godwin, Adebayo Aremu Ibikunle
{"title":"Facial fracture management in northwest Nigeria.","authors":"Abdurrazaq Olanrewaju Taiwo,&nbsp;Olujide Oladele Soyele,&nbsp;Ndubuizi Ugochukwu Godwin,&nbsp;Adebayo Aremu Ibikunle","doi":"10.4103/2006-8808.128723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Facial fracture is gradually become a public health problem in our community due to the attendant morbidity and mortality. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine the pattern of facial fracture in Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital. This cross-sectional study was undertaken to provide information regarding gender, age, etiology, and diagnosis of patients with maxillofacial fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 1-year review of patients diagnosed and treated for facial fractures in Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital between January 2011 and December 2011. The diagnosis was based on radiographic data and clinical examination. The main analysis outcome measures were etiology, age, gender, site, and treatment. Data were organized and presented by means of descriptive statistics and Pearson's Chi-square test. The level of significance adopted was 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 patients were treated in this period. Over 95% were male, 81% were caused by road traffic crash (RTC) and 86.4% were in the 21-30 years group. Most patients (52%) had mandibular fractures, and the most common site was the body. Most patients with midfacial fractures had fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary region (36%), while fractures of the parasymphyseal region were more common in the mandible 156 (31%). The most common treatment for jaw fractures was mandibulomaxillary fixation (MMF). Stable zygomatic complex fractures were reduced (elevated) intraorally, and unstable ones were supported by antral packs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights facial fractures secondary to RTC as a serious public health problem in our environment. Preventive strategies remain the cheapest way to reduce direct and indirect costs of the sequelae of RTC. It also bring to the fore the necessity to shift to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":89430,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical technique and case report","volume":"5 2","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/2006-8808.128723","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical technique and case report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2006-8808.128723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: Facial fracture is gradually become a public health problem in our community due to the attendant morbidity and mortality. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine the pattern of facial fracture in Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital. This cross-sectional study was undertaken to provide information regarding gender, age, etiology, and diagnosis of patients with maxillofacial fractures.

Materials and methods: A 1-year review of patients diagnosed and treated for facial fractures in Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital between January 2011 and December 2011. The diagnosis was based on radiographic data and clinical examination. The main analysis outcome measures were etiology, age, gender, site, and treatment. Data were organized and presented by means of descriptive statistics and Pearson's Chi-square test. The level of significance adopted was 5%.

Results: A total of 40 patients were treated in this period. Over 95% were male, 81% were caused by road traffic crash (RTC) and 86.4% were in the 21-30 years group. Most patients (52%) had mandibular fractures, and the most common site was the body. Most patients with midfacial fractures had fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary region (36%), while fractures of the parasymphyseal region were more common in the mandible 156 (31%). The most common treatment for jaw fractures was mandibulomaxillary fixation (MMF). Stable zygomatic complex fractures were reduced (elevated) intraorally, and unstable ones were supported by antral packs.

Conclusions: This study highlights facial fractures secondary to RTC as a serious public health problem in our environment. Preventive strategies remain the cheapest way to reduce direct and indirect costs of the sequelae of RTC. It also bring to the fore the necessity to shift to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of fractures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

尼日利亚西北部面部骨折的治疗。
背景:面部骨折因其发病率和死亡率而逐渐成为我国社会的公共卫生问题。因此,本研究的目的是确定乌斯马努丹佛迪约大学教学医院口腔颌面外科的面部骨折类型。本横断面研究旨在提供颌面骨折患者的性别、年龄、病因和诊断信息。材料与方法:对2011年1月至2011年12月在Usmanu Danfodiyo大学教学医院诊断和治疗的面部骨折患者进行1年的回顾性分析。诊断依据影像学资料和临床检查。主要分析指标为病因、年龄、性别、部位和治疗。采用描述性统计和Pearson卡方检验对数据进行整理和呈现。采用显著性水平为5%。结果:本组共治疗40例患者。男性占95%以上,道路交通事故(RTC)占81%,21-30岁年龄组占86.4%。大多数患者(52%)有下颌骨骨折,最常见的部位是身体。大多数面中骨折患者发生颧骨腋窝区骨折(36%),而下颌骨副骨区骨折(31%)更为常见。下颌骨折最常见的治疗方法是下颌颌骨固定(MMF)。稳定的颧骨复合体骨折经口内复位(升高),不稳定的颧骨复合体骨折由窦腔填充物支撑。结论:本研究强调RTC继发的面部骨折是我们环境中严重的公共卫生问题。预防战略仍然是减少RTC后遗症的直接和间接费用的最廉价方法。这也突出了骨折转向切开复位内固定(ORIF)的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信