Bilateral Synergy: A Framework for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation.

Rl Sainburg, D Good, A Przybyla
{"title":"Bilateral Synergy: A Framework for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation.","authors":"Rl Sainburg,&nbsp;D Good,&nbsp;A Przybyla","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unilateral stroke produces debilitating deficits in voluntary control in the contralesional arm, and significant motor coordination deficits in the ipsilesional arm. In addition, patients tend to avoid bilateral arm patterns and during performance of activities of daily living. Nevertheless, upper extremity physical rehabilitation predominantly focuses on motor training activities with only the paretic arm. This can be limiting because of persistent deficits in the ipsilesional arm, and because of the tendency of patients to avoid spontaneous bilateral arm patterns.</p><p><strong>Proposition: </strong>Rehabilitation should focus on bilateral training to advance recovery of function in both arms of stroke patients, as well as to facilitate spontaneous bilateral arm use. This paper reviews the rationale for this approach, citing evidence for significant hemisphere specific bilateral motor deficits in stroke patients, which affect both the contralesional and the ipsilesional arm. The rationale for, and advantages of, training both arms simultaneously through bilateral tasks is reviewed. Although bilateral training has been employed to treat stroke patients previously, this has tended to focus on bimanual 'coupling' as a rationale for performing parallel, but not cooperative bilateral tasks. Bilateral synergy provides a more functional framework for structuring post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bilateral synergy may be causally linked to spontaneous bilateral arm use, suggesting that rehabilitation should be focused on bilateral cooperative tasks, such as bilateral object transport. Further research is required to determine whether this approach could be efficacious for patients with hemiparesis, and whether both left and right hemisphere strokes can benefit from such intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":89985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurology & translational neuroscience","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3984050/pdf/nihms535702.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurology & translational neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unilateral stroke produces debilitating deficits in voluntary control in the contralesional arm, and significant motor coordination deficits in the ipsilesional arm. In addition, patients tend to avoid bilateral arm patterns and during performance of activities of daily living. Nevertheless, upper extremity physical rehabilitation predominantly focuses on motor training activities with only the paretic arm. This can be limiting because of persistent deficits in the ipsilesional arm, and because of the tendency of patients to avoid spontaneous bilateral arm patterns.

Proposition: Rehabilitation should focus on bilateral training to advance recovery of function in both arms of stroke patients, as well as to facilitate spontaneous bilateral arm use. This paper reviews the rationale for this approach, citing evidence for significant hemisphere specific bilateral motor deficits in stroke patients, which affect both the contralesional and the ipsilesional arm. The rationale for, and advantages of, training both arms simultaneously through bilateral tasks is reviewed. Although bilateral training has been employed to treat stroke patients previously, this has tended to focus on bimanual 'coupling' as a rationale for performing parallel, but not cooperative bilateral tasks. Bilateral synergy provides a more functional framework for structuring post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation.

Conclusion: Bilateral synergy may be causally linked to spontaneous bilateral arm use, suggesting that rehabilitation should be focused on bilateral cooperative tasks, such as bilateral object transport. Further research is required to determine whether this approach could be efficacious for patients with hemiparesis, and whether both left and right hemisphere strokes can benefit from such intervention.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

双边协同:卒中后康复的框架。
背景:单侧脑卒中在对侧臂的自主控制方面产生衰弱性缺陷,在同侧臂产生明显的运动协调缺陷。此外,患者倾向于避免双侧手臂模式和日常生活活动的表现。然而,上肢物理康复主要集中在运动训练活动,只有麻痹的手臂。这可能是有限的,因为同侧手臂的持续缺陷,因为患者倾向于避免自发的双侧手臂模式。建议:康复应注重双侧训练,以促进脑卒中患者双臂功能的恢复,并促进双侧手臂的自主使用。本文回顾了这种方法的基本原理,并引用了卒中患者显著半球特异性双侧运动缺陷的证据,这些缺陷影响对侧和同侧手臂。本文回顾了通过双边任务同时训练两种武器的理由和优点。虽然双侧训练以前曾用于治疗中风患者,但这往往侧重于将双手“耦合”作为执行平行而非合作双侧任务的基本原理。双侧协同作用为中风后上肢康复提供了更有效的框架。结论:双侧协同可能与自发的双侧手臂使用有因果关系,提示康复应侧重于双侧合作任务,如双侧物体运输。需要进一步的研究来确定这种方法是否对偏瘫患者有效,以及左右半球中风是否都能从这种干预中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信