Evaluating different aspects of prospective memory in amnestic and nonamnestic mild cognitive impairment.

ISRN Neurology Pub Date : 2014-03-05 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/805929
Rene Hernandez Cardenache, Lizmar Burguera, Amarilis Acevedo, Rosie Curiel, David A Loewenstein
{"title":"Evaluating different aspects of prospective memory in amnestic and nonamnestic mild cognitive impairment.","authors":"Rene Hernandez Cardenache,&nbsp;Lizmar Burguera,&nbsp;Amarilis Acevedo,&nbsp;Rosie Curiel,&nbsp;David A Loewenstein","doi":"10.1155/2014/805929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prospective memory, the inability to remember an intended action, is a common complaint, but not formally assessed in most clinical and research studies of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In this study, patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), non-amnestic cognitive impairment (naMCI), and cognitively normal (CN) elders were assessed using the Miami Prospective Memory Test (MPMT). A unique aspect of the paradigm was that participants were scored for intention to perform, accuracy in recollection for specific elements of the task, and the need for reminder cues. Excellent test-retest stability was obtained for MPMT Event-Related (ER), combined Time-Related (TR) subscales, and total MPMT score for aMCI subjects. MPMT impairments were observed in 48.6% of aMCI, 29.4% of naMCI, and 10.0% of normal elderly participants. Prospective memory deficits were common in participants with aMCI, and occurred in almost a third of naMCI participants. Intention to perform and need for reminder cues were significantly more impaired than retrospective memory for specific details of the task. It is concluded that assessment of different elements of prospective memory is important in MCI research and that inability to remember intended actions is a significant feature in those as risk for Alzheimer's disease. </p>","PeriodicalId":14626,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Neurology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"805929"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/805929","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/805929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Prospective memory, the inability to remember an intended action, is a common complaint, but not formally assessed in most clinical and research studies of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In this study, patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), non-amnestic cognitive impairment (naMCI), and cognitively normal (CN) elders were assessed using the Miami Prospective Memory Test (MPMT). A unique aspect of the paradigm was that participants were scored for intention to perform, accuracy in recollection for specific elements of the task, and the need for reminder cues. Excellent test-retest stability was obtained for MPMT Event-Related (ER), combined Time-Related (TR) subscales, and total MPMT score for aMCI subjects. MPMT impairments were observed in 48.6% of aMCI, 29.4% of naMCI, and 10.0% of normal elderly participants. Prospective memory deficits were common in participants with aMCI, and occurred in almost a third of naMCI participants. Intention to perform and need for reminder cues were significantly more impaired than retrospective memory for specific details of the task. It is concluded that assessment of different elements of prospective memory is important in MCI research and that inability to remember intended actions is a significant feature in those as risk for Alzheimer's disease.

Abstract Image

评估健忘和非健忘轻度认知障碍患者前瞻记忆的不同方面。
前瞻记忆,即无法记住预期的动作,是一种常见的抱怨,但在大多数轻度认知障碍(MCI)的临床和研究中并没有正式评估。本研究采用迈阿密前瞻记忆测试(MPMT)对遗忘性轻度认知障碍(aMCI)、非遗忘性认知障碍(naMCI)和认知正常(CN)老年人进行评估。该范式的一个独特之处在于,参与者的执行意图、对任务特定要素的回忆准确性以及对提醒线索的需求都被打分。aMCI受试者的MPMT事件相关量表(ER)、联合时间相关量表(TR)和MPMT总分均获得了良好的重测稳定性。在48.6%的aMCI、29.4%的naMCI和10.0%的正常老年参与者中观察到MPMT损伤。前瞻记忆缺陷在aMCI患者中很常见,几乎三分之一的naMCI患者都有前瞻记忆缺陷。对于任务的具体细节,执行意图和提示线索的需要明显比回顾记忆受损更严重。结论是,评估前瞻记忆的不同要素在MCI研究中很重要,而无法记住预期行为是阿尔茨海默病风险的一个重要特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信