Evaluation of Pharyngeal Function between No Bolus and Bolus Propofol Induced Sedation for Advanced Upper Endoscopy.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-03-03 DOI:10.1155/2014/248097
Shinsuke Kiriyama, Hiroshi Naitoh, Minoru Fukuchi, Takaharu Fukasawa, Kana Saito, Yuichi Tabe, Hayato Yamauchi, Tomonori Yoshida, Hiroyuki Kuwano
{"title":"Evaluation of Pharyngeal Function between No Bolus and Bolus Propofol Induced Sedation for Advanced Upper Endoscopy.","authors":"Shinsuke Kiriyama,&nbsp;Hiroshi Naitoh,&nbsp;Minoru Fukuchi,&nbsp;Takaharu Fukasawa,&nbsp;Kana Saito,&nbsp;Yuichi Tabe,&nbsp;Hayato Yamauchi,&nbsp;Tomonori Yoshida,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kuwano","doi":"10.1155/2014/248097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess pharyngeal function between no bolus and bolus propofol induced sedation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. A retrospective study was conducted involving consecutive gastric cancer patients. Patients in the no bolus group received a 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose of propofol after the initiation of sedation without bolus injection. All patients in the bolus group received the same maintenance dose of propofol with bolus 0.5 mg/kg propofol injection. Pharyngeal functions were evaluated endoscopically for the first 5 min following the initial administration of propofol. Fourteen patients received no bolus propofol induction and 13 received bolus propofol induction. Motionless vocal cords were observed in 2 patients (14%) in the no bolus group and 3 (23%) in the bolus group. Trachea cartilage was not observed in the no bolus group but was apparent in 6 patients (46%) in the bolus group (P < 0.01). Scope stimulated pharyngeal reflex was observed in 11 patients (79%) in the no bolus group and in 3 (23%) in the bolus group (P < 0.01). Propofol induced sedation without bolus administration preserves pharyngeal function and may constitute a safer sedation method than with bolus. </p>","PeriodicalId":11288,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy","volume":"2014 ","pages":"248097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/248097","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/248097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study aimed to assess pharyngeal function between no bolus and bolus propofol induced sedation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. A retrospective study was conducted involving consecutive gastric cancer patients. Patients in the no bolus group received a 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose of propofol after the initiation of sedation without bolus injection. All patients in the bolus group received the same maintenance dose of propofol with bolus 0.5 mg/kg propofol injection. Pharyngeal functions were evaluated endoscopically for the first 5 min following the initial administration of propofol. Fourteen patients received no bolus propofol induction and 13 received bolus propofol induction. Motionless vocal cords were observed in 2 patients (14%) in the no bolus group and 3 (23%) in the bolus group. Trachea cartilage was not observed in the no bolus group but was apparent in 6 patients (46%) in the bolus group (P < 0.01). Scope stimulated pharyngeal reflex was observed in 11 patients (79%) in the no bolus group and in 3 (23%) in the bolus group (P < 0.01). Propofol induced sedation without bolus administration preserves pharyngeal function and may constitute a safer sedation method than with bolus.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

晚期上腔镜检查中未注射和注射异丙酚诱导镇静的咽功能评价。
本研究旨在评估胃内镜下粘膜下剥离术中未注射异丙酚和注射异丙酚诱导的镇静对咽功能的影响。对连续的胃癌患者进行回顾性研究。无丸组患者在镇静开始后给予维持剂量3mg /kg/h的异丙酚,无丸注射。丸组患者均给予相同的异丙酚维持剂量,同时丸入0.5 mg/kg异丙酚注射液。在初次给药异丙酚后的前5分钟,内镜下评估咽功能。14例患者未接受大剂量异丙酚诱导,13例患者接受大剂量异丙酚诱导。未给药组2例(14%)出现声带不动,给药组3例(23%)出现声带不动。未给药组未见气管软骨,给药组有6例(46%)出现气管软骨,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。未给药组11例(79%)出现范围刺激咽反射,给药组3例(23%)出现范围刺激咽反射(P < 0.01)。不给药异丙酚诱导的镇静保留了咽功能,可能是比给药更安全的镇静方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信