In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of four vital pulp therapy materials on l929 fibroblasts.

ISRN dentistry Pub Date : 2014-03-03 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/191068
Aniket S Wadajkar, Chul Ahn, Kytai T Nguyen, Qiang Zhu, Takashi Komabayashi
{"title":"In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of four vital pulp therapy materials on l929 fibroblasts.","authors":"Aniket S Wadajkar,&nbsp;Chul Ahn,&nbsp;Kytai T Nguyen,&nbsp;Qiang Zhu,&nbsp;Takashi Komabayashi","doi":"10.1155/2014/191068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate cytotoxicity of direct pulp capping materials such as Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B on L929 fibroblasts. Freshly mixed or set materials were prepared and eluted by incubation with cell culture medium for working time period (fresh) or for 6 hours (set). The cells were exposed to media containing elutes for 24 hours, after which the cell survival was evaluated by MTS assays. In freshly mixed materials, average ± standard deviation % cell viabilities were 40.2 ± 14.0%, 43.7 ± 16.0%, 72.9 ± 12.7%, and 66.0 ± 13.6% for Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B, respectively. There was no statistical difference in cell viabilities among material groups, whereas in set materials, the cell viabilities were 48.7 ± 14.8%, 37.2 ± 10.6%, 46.7 ± 15.2%, and 100 ± 21.9% for Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B, respectively. Super-Bond C&B showed more cell viabilities than the other three material groups (P < 0.05). The four vital pulp therapy materials had similar cytotoxicity when the materials were fresh. Super-Bond C&B was less cytotoxic than Dycal, Life, and ProRoot MTA after the materials were set, which suggests the use of SB-C&B in future in vivo clinical investigations. </p>","PeriodicalId":89396,"journal":{"name":"ISRN dentistry","volume":"2014 ","pages":"191068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/191068","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/191068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate cytotoxicity of direct pulp capping materials such as Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B on L929 fibroblasts. Freshly mixed or set materials were prepared and eluted by incubation with cell culture medium for working time period (fresh) or for 6 hours (set). The cells were exposed to media containing elutes for 24 hours, after which the cell survival was evaluated by MTS assays. In freshly mixed materials, average ± standard deviation % cell viabilities were 40.2 ± 14.0%, 43.7 ± 16.0%, 72.9 ± 12.7%, and 66.0 ± 13.6% for Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B, respectively. There was no statistical difference in cell viabilities among material groups, whereas in set materials, the cell viabilities were 48.7 ± 14.8%, 37.2 ± 10.6%, 46.7 ± 15.2%, and 100 ± 21.9% for Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B, respectively. Super-Bond C&B showed more cell viabilities than the other three material groups (P < 0.05). The four vital pulp therapy materials had similar cytotoxicity when the materials were fresh. Super-Bond C&B was less cytotoxic than Dycal, Life, and ProRoot MTA after the materials were set, which suggests the use of SB-C&B in future in vivo clinical investigations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

四种重要牙髓治疗材料对1929年成纤维细胞的体外细胞毒性评价。
本研究旨在评估Dycal、Life、prooroot MTA、Super-Bond C&B等直接盖髓材料对L929成纤维细胞的细胞毒性。制备新鲜混合或凝固的材料,用细胞培养基孵育工作时间(新鲜)或6小时(凝固)洗脱。将细胞暴露于含洗脱液的培养基中24小时,之后用MTS法评估细胞存活情况。在新鲜混合的材料中,Dycal、Life、prooroot MTA和Super-Bond C&B的细胞存活率平均±标准差分别为40.2±14.0%、43.7±16.0%、72.9±12.7%和66.0±13.6%。Dycal、Life、prooroot MTA和Super-Bond C&B在固定材料中的细胞存活率分别为48.7±14.8%、37.2±10.6%、46.7±15.2%和100±21.9%,不同材料组间细胞存活率无统计学差异。Super-Bond C&B组细胞活力高于其他3个材料组(P < 0.05)。四种重要的牙髓治疗材料在材料新鲜时具有相似的细胞毒性。Super-Bond C&B在材料固化后的细胞毒性低于Dycal, Life和prooroot MTA,这表明SB-C&B可以在未来的体内临床研究中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信