Credibility matters: mind the gap.

Abstract

The purpose of the Science in Spine articles in EBSJ is to assist surgeons in understanding research, facilitate critical thinking about research beyond “statistical significance,” and to help enhance the quality of research that they report. Decisions by clinicians, patients, and policy makers rest on the quality and integrity of reported research. To avoid biased study reporting: It is important to have a framework such as PICOTS/PPOTS for specific primary study features a priori. It is important to report on all study results/outcomes regardless of statistical significance. It is important to consider the potential for various types of reporting and publication bias when critically appraising studies and systematic reviews. It is in the best interest of all to “mind the gap” and actively take steps to improve the value and reporting of research (regardless of study design or funding source) by following basic research steps to ensure quality.