Use of the 'patient journey' model in the internet-based pre-fitting counseling of a person with hearing disability: lessons from a failed clinical trial.

Q2 Medicine
Vinaya Manchaiah, Jerker Rönnberg, Gerhard Andersson, Thomas Lunner
{"title":"Use of the 'patient journey' model in the internet-based pre-fitting counseling of a person with hearing disability: lessons from a failed clinical trial.","authors":"Vinaya Manchaiah, Jerker Rönnberg, Gerhard Andersson, Thomas Lunner","doi":"10.1186/1472-6815-14-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persons with a hearing impairment have various experiences during their 'journey' through hearing loss. In our previous studies we have developed 'patient journey' models of person with hearing impairment and their communication partners (CPs). The study was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using the patient journey model in the internet-based pre-fitting counseling of a person with hearing disability (ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System: NCT01611129, registered 2012 May 14).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study employed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with waiting list control (WLC) design. Even though we had intended to recruit 158 participants, we only managed to recruit 80 participants who were assigned to one of two groups: (1) Intervention group; and (2) WLC. Participants from both groups completed a 30 day internet-based counseling program (group 2 waited for a month before intervention) based on the 'patient journey' model. Various outcome measures which focus on self-reported hearing disability, self-reported depression and anxiety, readiness to change and self-reported hearing disability acceptance were administered pre- and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial results suggest that the intervention was not feasible. Treatment compliancy was one of the main problems with a high number of dropouts. Only 18 participants completed both pre- and post-intervention outcome measures. Their results were included in the analysis. Results suggest no statistically significant differences among groups over time in all four measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the limited sample size, no concrete conclusions can be drawn about the hypotheses from the current study. Furthermore, possible reasons for failure of this trial and directions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39843,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-14-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Persons with a hearing impairment have various experiences during their 'journey' through hearing loss. In our previous studies we have developed 'patient journey' models of person with hearing impairment and their communication partners (CPs). The study was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using the patient journey model in the internet-based pre-fitting counseling of a person with hearing disability (ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System: NCT01611129, registered 2012 May 14).

Method: The study employed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with waiting list control (WLC) design. Even though we had intended to recruit 158 participants, we only managed to recruit 80 participants who were assigned to one of two groups: (1) Intervention group; and (2) WLC. Participants from both groups completed a 30 day internet-based counseling program (group 2 waited for a month before intervention) based on the 'patient journey' model. Various outcome measures which focus on self-reported hearing disability, self-reported depression and anxiety, readiness to change and self-reported hearing disability acceptance were administered pre- and post-intervention.

Results: The trial results suggest that the intervention was not feasible. Treatment compliancy was one of the main problems with a high number of dropouts. Only 18 participants completed both pre- and post-intervention outcome measures. Their results were included in the analysis. Results suggest no statistically significant differences among groups over time in all four measures.

Conclusions: Due to the limited sample size, no concrete conclusions can be drawn about the hypotheses from the current study. Furthermore, possible reasons for failure of this trial and directions for future research are discussed.

Abstract Image

在基于互联网的听力残疾人士配戴前咨询中使用 "患者历程 "模型:从一次失败的临床试验中汲取的经验教训。
背景:听力障碍患者在听力损失的 "旅程 "中会有各种各样的经历。在以往的研究中,我们开发了听障人士及其沟通伙伴(CPs)的 "患者历程 "模型。本研究旨在评估在基于互联网的听力障碍人士配戴前咨询中使用患者旅程模型的有效性(ClinicalTrials.gov 协议注册系统:方法:本研究采用随机对照试验(RCT)和候补名单对照(WLC)设计。尽管我们原计划招募 158 名参与者,但只招募到 80 名参与者,他们被分配到两组中的一组:(1) 干预组;(2) WLC 组。两组参与者都完成了为期 30 天的基于 "患者历程 "模式的互联网咨询项目(第二组在干预前等待一个月)。干预前后进行了各种结果测量,重点是自我报告的听力残疾情况、自我报告的抑郁和焦虑情况、改变的意愿以及自我报告的听力残疾接受程度:试验结果表明,干预并不可行。治疗依从性是主要问题之一,辍学人数较多。只有 18 名参与者完成了干预前后的结果测量。他们的结果被纳入分析。结果表明,在所有四项测量指标上,各组间的差异在统计学上并不显著:由于样本量有限,目前的研究还不能对假设得出具体结论。此外,还讨论了本次试验失败的可能原因以及未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of ear, nose and throat disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders (ISSN 1472-6815) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信