The Differences and Similarities between Allergists and Non-Allergists for Penicillin Allergy Management.

Journal of allergy Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-02-24 DOI:10.1155/2014/214183
Nayot Suetrong, Jettanong Klaewsongkram
{"title":"The Differences and Similarities between Allergists and Non-Allergists for Penicillin Allergy Management.","authors":"Nayot Suetrong,&nbsp;Jettanong Klaewsongkram","doi":"10.1155/2014/214183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the management of patients with a history of penicillin allergy between allergists and non-allergists in Thailand. A questionnaire was distributed to Thai physicians by online survey. The answers from 205 physicians were analyzed. The discrepancy of penicillin allergy management between allergists and non-allergists was clearly demonstrated in patients with a history of an immediate reaction in the presence of penicillin skin test (P < 0.01) and in patients with a history of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (P < 0.05) from penicillin. Allergists are more willing to confirm penicillin allergic status, more likely to carefully administer penicillin even after negative skin test, but less concerned for the potential cross-reactivity with 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins, compared to non-allergists. The lack of penicillin skin test reagents, the reliability of penicillin allergy history, and medicolegal problem were the main reasons for prescribing alternate antibiotics without confirmation of penicillin allergic status. In summary, the different management of penicillin allergy between allergists and non-allergists was significantly demonstrated in patients with a history of severe non-immediate reaction and in patients with a history of an immediate reaction when a penicillin skin test is available. </p>","PeriodicalId":88910,"journal":{"name":"Journal of allergy","volume":"2014 ","pages":"214183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/214183","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/214183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the management of patients with a history of penicillin allergy between allergists and non-allergists in Thailand. A questionnaire was distributed to Thai physicians by online survey. The answers from 205 physicians were analyzed. The discrepancy of penicillin allergy management between allergists and non-allergists was clearly demonstrated in patients with a history of an immediate reaction in the presence of penicillin skin test (P < 0.01) and in patients with a history of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (P < 0.05) from penicillin. Allergists are more willing to confirm penicillin allergic status, more likely to carefully administer penicillin even after negative skin test, but less concerned for the potential cross-reactivity with 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins, compared to non-allergists. The lack of penicillin skin test reagents, the reliability of penicillin allergy history, and medicolegal problem were the main reasons for prescribing alternate antibiotics without confirmation of penicillin allergic status. In summary, the different management of penicillin allergy between allergists and non-allergists was significantly demonstrated in patients with a history of severe non-immediate reaction and in patients with a history of an immediate reaction when a penicillin skin test is available.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

过敏专科医师与非过敏专科医师在青霉素过敏管理上的异同。
本研究的目的是比较泰国的过敏科医生和非过敏科医生对青霉素过敏史患者的管理。通过在线调查向泰国医生分发了一份问卷。对205名医生的回答进行了分析。在青霉素皮试有立即反应史的患者(P < 0.01)和有青霉素史的Stevens-Johnson综合征患者(P < 0.05)中,敏应科医师和非敏应科医师对青霉素过敏处理的差异明显。与非过敏专科医师相比,过敏专科医师更愿意确认青霉素过敏状态,即使皮试阴性也更可能谨慎地给药青霉素,但不太关心与第三代和第四代头孢菌素的潜在交叉反应。青霉素皮试试剂的缺乏、青霉素过敏史的可靠性以及医学法律问题是在未确认青霉素过敏状态的情况下开具替代抗生素的主要原因。总之,在有严重非立即反应史的患者和有立即反应史的患者中,当青霉素皮肤试验可用时,过敏科医师和非过敏科医师对青霉素过敏的不同处理得到了显著证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信