Prevalence and Risk Factors of Central Venous Stenosis among Prevalent Hemodialysis Patients, a Single Center Experience.

Osama O Osman, Abdul-Rahman A El-Magzoub, Sarra Elamin
{"title":"Prevalence and Risk Factors of Central Venous Stenosis among Prevalent Hemodialysis Patients, a Single Center Experience.","authors":"Osama O Osman,&nbsp;Abdul-Rahman A El-Magzoub,&nbsp;Sarra Elamin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Central vein stenosis (CVS) is a common complication of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. In this study we evaluated the prevalence and risk factors of CVS among hemodialysis (HD) patients in a single center in Sudan, using Doppler ultrasound as a screening tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 106 prevalent HD patients. For every patient, we performed Duplex Doppler for the right and left jugular, subclavian and femoral veins. A patient was considered to have hemodynamically significant stenosis if the pre-stenosis to the post-stenosis velocities ratio was ≥ 2.5 or they had complete vein occlusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 28.3% of patients had Doppler detected CVS, including 25.5% with hemodynamically significant stenosis and 2.8% with compromised flow. The prevalence of CVS was 68.4% among symptomatic patients compared to 19.5% in asymptomatic patients. The prevalence of CVS among patients with history of 0-1, 2-3 and ≥ 4 central venous catheters was 3.4%, 29.4% and 53.8% respectively (p=0.00). CVS was not more common in patients with history of previous/current jugular or femoral vein catheterization compared to no catheter placement in these veins (28.3% vs 28.6% and 35% vs 26.7% respectively; p >0.1). However, CVS was significantly more common in patients with previous/ current subclavian vein catheterization compared to no catheter placement in this vein (47.8% vs 22.9%, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CVS is highly prevalent among studied HD patients, particularly in the presence of suggestive clinical signs. The number of HD catheter placements and subclavian vein utilization for dialysis access impose a significantly higher risk of CVS.</p>","PeriodicalId":89079,"journal":{"name":"Arab journal of nephrology and transplantation","volume":"7 1","pages":"45-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab journal of nephrology and transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Central vein stenosis (CVS) is a common complication of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. In this study we evaluated the prevalence and risk factors of CVS among hemodialysis (HD) patients in a single center in Sudan, using Doppler ultrasound as a screening tool.

Methods: The study included 106 prevalent HD patients. For every patient, we performed Duplex Doppler for the right and left jugular, subclavian and femoral veins. A patient was considered to have hemodynamically significant stenosis if the pre-stenosis to the post-stenosis velocities ratio was ≥ 2.5 or they had complete vein occlusion.

Results: Overall, 28.3% of patients had Doppler detected CVS, including 25.5% with hemodynamically significant stenosis and 2.8% with compromised flow. The prevalence of CVS was 68.4% among symptomatic patients compared to 19.5% in asymptomatic patients. The prevalence of CVS among patients with history of 0-1, 2-3 and ≥ 4 central venous catheters was 3.4%, 29.4% and 53.8% respectively (p=0.00). CVS was not more common in patients with history of previous/current jugular or femoral vein catheterization compared to no catheter placement in these veins (28.3% vs 28.6% and 35% vs 26.7% respectively; p >0.1). However, CVS was significantly more common in patients with previous/ current subclavian vein catheterization compared to no catheter placement in this vein (47.8% vs 22.9%, p = 0.02).

Conclusion: CVS is highly prevalent among studied HD patients, particularly in the presence of suggestive clinical signs. The number of HD catheter placements and subclavian vein utilization for dialysis access impose a significantly higher risk of CVS.

流行血液透析患者中心静脉狭窄的患病率和危险因素,单中心经验。
中心静脉狭窄(CVS)是中心静脉导管(CVC)置入的常见并发症。在这项研究中,我们使用多普勒超声作为筛查工具,评估了苏丹单一中心血液透析(HD)患者中CVS的患病率和危险因素。方法:选取106例HD患者为研究对象。对于每位患者,我们对左右颈静脉、锁骨下静脉和股静脉进行双多普勒检查。如果狭窄前与狭窄后的速度比≥2.5或静脉完全闭塞,则认为患者有血流动力学显著性狭窄。结果:总体而言,28.3%的患者有多普勒检测到CVS,其中25.5%为血流动力学显著狭窄,2.8%为血流受损。有症状患者的CVS患病率为68.4%,而无症状患者的CVS患病率为19.5%。中心静脉置管0 ~ 1根、2 ~ 3根、≥4根患者的CVS患病率分别为3.4%、29.4%、53.8% (p=0.00)。既往/目前有颈静脉或股静脉置管史的患者与未置管的患者相比,CVS并不更为常见(分别为28.3%对28.6%和35%对26.7%;p > 0.1)。然而,CVS在既往/目前有锁骨下静脉置管的患者中比未置管的患者更常见(47.8% vs 22.9%, p = 0.02)。结论:CVS在研究的HD患者中非常普遍,特别是在存在提示性临床体征的患者中。HD导管放置的数量和锁骨下静脉透析通路的使用显著增加了CVS的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书