Comparative analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of demographic policies in EU countries (2009-2010).

Q4 Medicine
George Pierrakos, Dionyssis Balourdos, Sotiris Soulis, Markos Sarris, John Pateras, Panagiotis Skolarikos, Athanasios Farfaras
{"title":"Comparative analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of demographic policies in EU countries (2009-2010).","authors":"George Pierrakos,&nbsp;Dionyssis Balourdos,&nbsp;Sotiris Soulis,&nbsp;Markos Sarris,&nbsp;John Pateras,&nbsp;Panagiotis Skolarikos,&nbsp;Athanasios Farfaras","doi":"10.12927/whp.2014.23720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This article contains a comparative analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of population policies in European Union (EU) countries, using multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>To study these differences, it is primarily necessary to have the relevant data. The most recent database available was developed by the OECD in 2007 and currently covers OECD countries and most EU Member States. We used multivariate analysis to categorize the indicators into the following groups: (a) economic indicators, (b) indicators reconciling work and family life, and (c) demographic indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of measuring the degree of coherence of factors reveal that the four most important factors influencing the effectiveness of population policy are (i) the average maternal age at first childbirth, (ii) social protection expenditure, (iii) GDP, and (iv) public spending for benefits. Based on the data from the evaluation of the correlation matrix of variables and data, the classification of countries, according to the values of the coefficients of analysis, appears as follows: the Nordic countries (together with France and the United Kingdom), the Southern European countries and the Northern countries: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania (by a very slight margin Romania), and Bulgaria, Poland, Slovakia (and, marginally, Malta).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The key comparative findings from benchmarking best practices in the context of the European experience are the following: The EU is being demographically transformed as a direct result of an increase in average life expectancy and immigration and a decrease in fertility. Demographic factors are influenced by specific features, in contrast with economic factors which seem be less stable.</p>","PeriodicalId":40038,"journal":{"name":"World health & population","volume":"15 1","pages":"31-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World health & population","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/whp.2014.23720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: This article contains a comparative analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of population policies in European Union (EU) countries, using multivariate analysis.

Data and methods: To study these differences, it is primarily necessary to have the relevant data. The most recent database available was developed by the OECD in 2007 and currently covers OECD countries and most EU Member States. We used multivariate analysis to categorize the indicators into the following groups: (a) economic indicators, (b) indicators reconciling work and family life, and (c) demographic indicators.

Results: The results of measuring the degree of coherence of factors reveal that the four most important factors influencing the effectiveness of population policy are (i) the average maternal age at first childbirth, (ii) social protection expenditure, (iii) GDP, and (iv) public spending for benefits. Based on the data from the evaluation of the correlation matrix of variables and data, the classification of countries, according to the values of the coefficients of analysis, appears as follows: the Nordic countries (together with France and the United Kingdom), the Southern European countries and the Northern countries: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania (by a very slight margin Romania), and Bulgaria, Poland, Slovakia (and, marginally, Malta).

Conclusions: The key comparative findings from benchmarking best practices in the context of the European experience are the following: The EU is being demographically transformed as a direct result of an increase in average life expectancy and immigration and a decrease in fertility. Demographic factors are influenced by specific features, in contrast with economic factors which seem be less stable.

欧盟国家人口政策有效性的比较分析与评价(2009-2010)。
目的:本文采用多变量分析对欧盟国家人口政策的有效性进行了比较分析和评价。数据和方法:要研究这些差异,首先需要有相关的数据。最新的数据库是经合组织于2007年开发的,目前涵盖经合组织国家和大多数欧盟成员国。我们使用多变量分析将指标分为以下几组:(a)经济指标,(b)协调工作和家庭生活的指标,以及(c)人口指标。结果:衡量因素一致性的结果显示,影响人口政策有效性的四个最重要因素是:(i)产妇平均初产年龄,(ii)社会保障支出,(iii)国内生产总值,(iv)公共福利支出。根据对变量和数据的关联矩阵的评价所得的数据,根据分析系数的值对国家进行分类如下:北欧国家(连同法国和联合王国)、南欧国家和北方国家:爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚、立陶宛(罗马尼亚的差距很小)、保加利亚、波兰、斯洛伐克(马耳他的差距很小)。结论:在欧洲经验的背景下,基准最佳做法的主要比较结果如下:欧盟正在发生人口结构上的转变,这是平均预期寿命和移民增加以及生育率下降的直接结果。人口因素受到特定特征的影响,而经济因素似乎不太稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World health & population
World health & population Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书