{"title":"Cohen's Conservatism and Human Enhancement.","authors":"Jonathan Pugh, Guy Kahane, Julian Savulescu","doi":"10.1007/s10892-013-9151-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In an intriguing essay, G. A. Cohen has defended a conservative bias in favour of existing value. In this paper, we consider whether Cohen's conservatism raises a new challenge to the use of human enhancement technologies. We develop some of Cohen's suggestive remarks into a new line of argument against human enhancement that, we believe, is in several ways superior to existing objections. However, we shall argue that on closer inspection, Cohen's conservatism fails to offer grounds for a strong sweeping objection to enhancement, and may even offer <i>positive</i> support for forms of enhancement that preserve valuable features of human beings. Nevertheless, we concede that Cohen's arguments may suggest some plausible and important constraints on the <i>modality</i> of legitimate and desirable enhancements.</p>","PeriodicalId":514581,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ethics","volume":"17 ","pages":"331-354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-013-9151-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In an intriguing essay, G. A. Cohen has defended a conservative bias in favour of existing value. In this paper, we consider whether Cohen's conservatism raises a new challenge to the use of human enhancement technologies. We develop some of Cohen's suggestive remarks into a new line of argument against human enhancement that, we believe, is in several ways superior to existing objections. However, we shall argue that on closer inspection, Cohen's conservatism fails to offer grounds for a strong sweeping objection to enhancement, and may even offer positive support for forms of enhancement that preserve valuable features of human beings. Nevertheless, we concede that Cohen's arguments may suggest some plausible and important constraints on the modality of legitimate and desirable enhancements.
在一篇有趣的文章中,g·a·科恩(G. a . Cohen)为支持现有价值的保守偏见进行了辩护。在本文中,我们考虑科恩的保守主义是否对人类增强技术的使用提出了新的挑战。我们将科恩的一些暗示性言论发展成反对人类增强的新观点,我们认为,这种观点在某些方面优于现有的反对意见。然而,我们认为,如果仔细观察,科恩的保守主义并没有为强烈反对强化提供理由,甚至可能为保留人类有价值特征的强化形式提供积极的支持。然而,我们承认,科恩的论点可能对合法和可取的增强方式提出了一些合理和重要的限制。