The impact of insurance and a usual source of care on emergency department use in the United States.

International journal of family medicine Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-02-09 DOI:10.1155/2014/842847
Winston Liaw, Stephen Petterson, David L Rabin, Andrew Bazemore
{"title":"The impact of insurance and a usual source of care on emergency department use in the United States.","authors":"Winston Liaw,&nbsp;Stephen Petterson,&nbsp;David L Rabin,&nbsp;Andrew Bazemore","doi":"10.1155/2014/842847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Finding a usual source of care (USC) is difficult for certain populations. This analysis determines how insurance type and having a USC affect the settings in which patients seek care. Methods. In this cross-sectional study of the 2000-2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys, we assessed the percentage of low-income persons with half or more of their ambulatory visits to the emergency department (ED). Respondents were stratified based on insurance type and presence of a USC. Results. In 2011, among Medicaid enrollees without USCs, 21.6% had half or more of their ambulatory visits to EDs compared to 8.1% for those with USCs. Among the uninsured without USCs, 24.1% went to an ED for half or more of their ambulatory visits compared to 8.8% for those with USCs in 2011. Among the privately insured without USCs, 7.8% went to an ED for half or more of their ambulatory visits compared to 5.0% for those with USCs in 2011. These differences remained in multivariate analyses. Conclusions. Those who lack USCs, particularly the uninsured and Medicaid enrollees, are more likely to rely on EDs. </p>","PeriodicalId":89569,"journal":{"name":"International journal of family medicine","volume":"2014 ","pages":"842847"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/842847","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/842847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background. Finding a usual source of care (USC) is difficult for certain populations. This analysis determines how insurance type and having a USC affect the settings in which patients seek care. Methods. In this cross-sectional study of the 2000-2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys, we assessed the percentage of low-income persons with half or more of their ambulatory visits to the emergency department (ED). Respondents were stratified based on insurance type and presence of a USC. Results. In 2011, among Medicaid enrollees without USCs, 21.6% had half or more of their ambulatory visits to EDs compared to 8.1% for those with USCs. Among the uninsured without USCs, 24.1% went to an ED for half or more of their ambulatory visits compared to 8.8% for those with USCs in 2011. Among the privately insured without USCs, 7.8% went to an ED for half or more of their ambulatory visits compared to 5.0% for those with USCs in 2011. These differences remained in multivariate analyses. Conclusions. Those who lack USCs, particularly the uninsured and Medicaid enrollees, are more likely to rely on EDs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在美国,保险和通常的护理来源对急诊科使用的影响。
背景。对于某些人群来说,找到常规护理来源(USC)是很困难的。该分析确定了保险类型和拥有USC如何影响患者寻求护理的环境。方法。在这项2000-2011年医疗支出小组调查的横断面研究中,我们评估了低收入人群到急诊科(ED)进行一半或更多门诊就诊的百分比。受访者根据保险类型和USC的存在进行分层。结果。2011年,在没有USCs的医疗补助计划参保者中,21.6%的人有一半或更多的急诊室门诊就诊,而有USCs的参保者只有8.1%。在没有USCs的未保险人群中,24.1%的人在一半或更多的门诊就诊中去了急诊科,而2011年有USCs的人群中这一比例为8.8%。2011年,在没有USCs的私人参保人群中,7.8%的人去急诊室进行了一半或更多的门诊就诊,而在有USCs的人群中,这一比例为5.0%。这些差异在多变量分析中仍然存在。结论。那些缺乏usc的人,特别是没有保险和医疗补助的人,更有可能依赖于急诊科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书