Notification card to alert for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is stigmatizing from the patient's point of view.

Eva Skyman, Ingegerd Bergbom, Berit Lindahl, Leif Larsson, Anna Lindqvist, Harrieth Thunberg Sjöström, Christina Ahrén
{"title":"Notification card to alert for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is stigmatizing from the patient's point of view.","authors":"Eva Skyman,&nbsp;Ingegerd Bergbom,&nbsp;Berit Lindahl,&nbsp;Leif Larsson,&nbsp;Anna Lindqvist,&nbsp;Harrieth Thunberg Sjöström,&nbsp;Christina Ahrén","doi":"10.3109/00365548.2014.896029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The importance of alerting health care systems of patients carrying multidrug-resistant bacteria (MRB) is highlighted in numerous guidelines. In the absence of electronic alert systems, notification cards are often recommended, but have rarely been evaluated. We evaluated patient experiences of receiving and using a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) notification card.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two cohorts of patients given a card when identified for the first time as a carrier in 1999-2003 and 2008-2010, responded to questionnaires distributed in 2004 and 2011, respectively. The response rate in 2004 was 92 (38 females)/129 and in 2011 was 110 (55 females)/209. In addition, 63% and 49%, respectively, followed the encouragement to provide written comments to the questions. These were analysed using a qualitative method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients took responsibility not to infect others, reported high usage, and acknowledged the importance of the card to inform health care institutions about their carrier status, despite experiencing fear, disrespect, lack of knowledge, and unprofessional behaviour when presenting it to personnel. Alarmingly these stigmatizing experiences were more frequent in 2011. Professional behaviour was reported from the infectious disease clinic. A majority of the patients were unaware of how they had acquired MRSA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MRSA notification card was felt to stigmatize the patient, which makes its use questionable. Other alert methods need to be developed. Most importantly, the study demonstrates the importance for these patients to meet staff educated about MRB. Thus, there is an urgent need to educate health care professionals at all levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":21541,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365548.2014.896029","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2014.896029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: The importance of alerting health care systems of patients carrying multidrug-resistant bacteria (MRB) is highlighted in numerous guidelines. In the absence of electronic alert systems, notification cards are often recommended, but have rarely been evaluated. We evaluated patient experiences of receiving and using a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) notification card.

Methods: Two cohorts of patients given a card when identified for the first time as a carrier in 1999-2003 and 2008-2010, responded to questionnaires distributed in 2004 and 2011, respectively. The response rate in 2004 was 92 (38 females)/129 and in 2011 was 110 (55 females)/209. In addition, 63% and 49%, respectively, followed the encouragement to provide written comments to the questions. These were analysed using a qualitative method.

Results: The patients took responsibility not to infect others, reported high usage, and acknowledged the importance of the card to inform health care institutions about their carrier status, despite experiencing fear, disrespect, lack of knowledge, and unprofessional behaviour when presenting it to personnel. Alarmingly these stigmatizing experiences were more frequent in 2011. Professional behaviour was reported from the infectious disease clinic. A majority of the patients were unaware of how they had acquired MRSA.

Conclusions: The MRSA notification card was felt to stigmatize the patient, which makes its use questionable. Other alert methods need to be developed. Most importantly, the study demonstrates the importance for these patients to meet staff educated about MRB. Thus, there is an urgent need to educate health care professionals at all levels.

从患者的角度来看,提醒耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的通知卡是一种耻辱。
背景:在许多指南中都强调了提醒卫生保健系统携带耐多药细菌(MRB)患者的重要性。在没有电子警报系统的情况下,通常建议使用通知卡,但很少进行评估。我们评估了接受和使用耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)通知卡的患者经历。方法:两组患者分别在1999-2003年和2008-2010年首次被确定为携带者时获得卡片,并对2004年和2011年分发的问卷进行回答。2004年应答率为92 /129(女性38人),2011年应答率为110 /209(女性55人)。此外,分别有63%和49%的人遵循鼓励对问题提供书面评论。用定性方法对其进行了分析。结果:患者承担了不感染他人的责任,报告使用率很高,并承认卡在告知卫生保健机构其携带者身份方面的重要性,尽管在向工作人员出示卡时经历了恐惧、不尊重、缺乏知识和不专业的行为。令人震惊的是,这些污名化的经历在2011年更为频繁。传染病诊所报告了专业行为。大多数患者并不知道他们是如何感染MRSA的。结论:MRSA通报卡被认为是对患者的污名化,其使用值得怀疑。需要开发其他警报方法。最重要的是,该研究证明了这些患者与受过MRB教育的医护人员见面的重要性。因此,迫切需要对各级保健专业人员进行教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信