Perspectives of significant others in dialysis modality decision-making: a qualitative study.

CANNT journal = Journal ACITN Pub Date : 2013-10-01
Alexis de Rosenroll, Kathryn Smith Higuchi, Katherine Standish Dutton, Mary Ann Murray, Dawn Stacey
{"title":"Perspectives of significant others in dialysis modality decision-making: a qualitative study.","authors":"Alexis de Rosenroll,&nbsp;Kathryn Smith Higuchi,&nbsp;Katherine Standish Dutton,&nbsp;Mary Ann Murray,&nbsp;Dawn Stacey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the experience of the dialysis modality decision-making process from the perspective of the significant other.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative interpretive description study was conducted using the Interprofessional Shared Decision Making Model (Légaré et al., 2011). Data collection included one-on-one, semi-structured interviews, the Decisional Regret Scale, and the SURE tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten significant others were interviewed. They included wives, husbands, and daughters of dialysis patients. Their roles involved providing a positive outlook, \"being with\", advocating, caregiving, learning together, sharing opinions, and communicating values, preferences and treatment feasibility. Broader factors influencing significant others included choosing life, unanticipated life change, and personal health problems. Implementation of the chosen modality resulted in unanticipated events, relationship changes and challenges to travelling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant others play supportive roles for dialysis patients and are involved in the decision-making process associated with treatment decisions. Significant others may have concurrent emotional, informational, and physical needs that affect their role in making and/or implementing the decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":83648,"journal":{"name":"CANNT journal = Journal ACITN","volume":"23 4","pages":"17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANNT journal = Journal ACITN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the experience of the dialysis modality decision-making process from the perspective of the significant other.

Methods: A qualitative interpretive description study was conducted using the Interprofessional Shared Decision Making Model (Légaré et al., 2011). Data collection included one-on-one, semi-structured interviews, the Decisional Regret Scale, and the SURE tool.

Results: Ten significant others were interviewed. They included wives, husbands, and daughters of dialysis patients. Their roles involved providing a positive outlook, "being with", advocating, caregiving, learning together, sharing opinions, and communicating values, preferences and treatment feasibility. Broader factors influencing significant others included choosing life, unanticipated life change, and personal health problems. Implementation of the chosen modality resulted in unanticipated events, relationship changes and challenges to travelling.

Conclusion: Significant others play supportive roles for dialysis patients and are involved in the decision-making process associated with treatment decisions. Significant others may have concurrent emotional, informational, and physical needs that affect their role in making and/or implementing the decision.

透析模式决策中重要他人的观点:一项定性研究。
目的:从意义他者的角度探讨透析方式决策过程的经验。方法:采用跨专业共享决策模型进行定性解释性描述研究(l等,2011)。数据收集包括一对一、半结构化访谈、决策后悔量表和SURE工具。结果:访谈了10位重要他人。他们包括透析患者的妻子、丈夫和女儿。他们的角色包括提供积极的前景,“与”,倡导,照顾,一起学习,分享意见,沟通价值观,偏好和治疗可行性。影响另一半的更广泛的因素包括选择生活、意想不到的生活变化和个人健康问题。所选择的模式的实施导致了意想不到的事件,关系的变化和旅行的挑战。结论:重要他人对透析患者起支持作用,参与治疗决策的决策过程。重要的他人可能同时有情感、信息和身体需求,这些需求会影响他们在决策和/或执行决策中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书