Clinical manifestation and prognosis of vestibular migraine according to the vestibular function test results.

Korean journal of audiology Pub Date : 2013-04-01 Epub Date: 2013-04-16 DOI:10.7874/kja.2013.17.1.18
Jae-Wook Lee, Jae Yun Jung, You Sun Chung, Myung-Whan Suh
{"title":"Clinical manifestation and prognosis of vestibular migraine according to the vestibular function test results.","authors":"Jae-Wook Lee,&nbsp;Jae Yun Jung,&nbsp;You Sun Chung,&nbsp;Myung-Whan Suh","doi":"10.7874/kja.2013.17.1.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>ACCORDING TO PREVIOUS REPORTS, PATIENTS WITH VESTIBULAR MIGRAINE (VM) DISPLAY VARIABLE RESULTS FROM VESTIBULAR FUNCTION TESTS (VFT): central, peripheral, or normal. The aim of this study was to classify the VM patients into the three groups according to interictal VFT findings (central, peripheral or normal) and to clarify the relationship between VFT results and the clinical manifestations and prognosis in each group.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>We reviewed the medical records of 81 patients diagnosed as VM using the criteria of Neuhauser, et al. between December 2004 and June 2009. Patients were divided into three groups according to the results of VFT. We compared the clinical manifestations and prognosis between groups. Characteristics including dizziness, the nature of headache, associated otologic symptoms, hearing threshold, duration of illness, and recovery time were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of patients with central, peripheral vestibular dysfunction and normal finding in VFT were 15, 28, and 38 respectively. There were no significant differences in the nature of headache, associated otologic symptoms, hearing threshold, duration of illness, and recovery time. A small difference was observed in the mean age and characteristics of dizziness, but these were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with VM, classification according to the type of vestibular dysfunction was not helpful in the prediction of prognosis and clinical manifestations.</p>","PeriodicalId":90252,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of audiology","volume":"17 1","pages":"18-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/68/kja-17-18.PMC3936516.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7874/kja.2013.17.1.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background and objectives: ACCORDING TO PREVIOUS REPORTS, PATIENTS WITH VESTIBULAR MIGRAINE (VM) DISPLAY VARIABLE RESULTS FROM VESTIBULAR FUNCTION TESTS (VFT): central, peripheral, or normal. The aim of this study was to classify the VM patients into the three groups according to interictal VFT findings (central, peripheral or normal) and to clarify the relationship between VFT results and the clinical manifestations and prognosis in each group.

Subjects and methods: We reviewed the medical records of 81 patients diagnosed as VM using the criteria of Neuhauser, et al. between December 2004 and June 2009. Patients were divided into three groups according to the results of VFT. We compared the clinical manifestations and prognosis between groups. Characteristics including dizziness, the nature of headache, associated otologic symptoms, hearing threshold, duration of illness, and recovery time were analyzed.

Results: The number of patients with central, peripheral vestibular dysfunction and normal finding in VFT were 15, 28, and 38 respectively. There were no significant differences in the nature of headache, associated otologic symptoms, hearing threshold, duration of illness, and recovery time. A small difference was observed in the mean age and characteristics of dizziness, but these were not significant.

Conclusions: In patients with VM, classification according to the type of vestibular dysfunction was not helpful in the prediction of prognosis and clinical manifestations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

根据前庭功能检查结果分析前庭偏头痛的临床表现及预后。
背景和目的:根据以前的报道,前庭偏头痛(VM)患者在前庭功能检查(VFT)中显示出不同的结果:中枢、外周或正常。本研究的目的是根据VFT间期表现(中央、外周或正常)将VM患者分为三组,并明确各组VFT结果与临床表现及预后的关系。研究对象和方法:我们回顾了2004年12月至2009年6月间使用Neuhauser等人的标准诊断为VM的81例患者的病历。根据VFT结果将患者分为三组。比较两组患者的临床表现及预后。分析患者的特点,包括头晕、头痛的性质、相关耳科症状、听力阈值、病程和恢复时间。结果:中枢性前庭功能障碍15例,外周前庭功能障碍28例,VFT检查正常38例。在头痛的性质、相关的耳科症状、听力阈值、疾病持续时间和恢复时间方面没有显著差异。在平均年龄和头晕特征上观察到微小的差异,但这些差异并不显著。结论:在VM患者中,根据前庭功能障碍的类型进行分类对预测预后和临床表现没有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信