[Early orthodontic treatment for growth modification by functional appliances--pros and cons].

Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (1993) Pub Date : 2014-01-01
M Tzemach, D Aizenbud, S Einy
{"title":"[Early orthodontic treatment for growth modification by functional appliances--pros and cons].","authors":"M Tzemach,&nbsp;D Aizenbud,&nbsp;S Einy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal timing for commencement of orthodontic treatment has been controversial. Initial early orthodontic treatment usually begins at the deciduous dentition or early mixed dentition stage and continues for 12-18 months. In most cases, a second treatment phase will be required in the permanent dentition stage to achieve the treatment goals and a stable occlusion. One of the main purposes of the early treatment phase is to affect the growth pattern of the jaw and consequently correct skeletal imbalance and prevent future severe malocclusion by means of growth modification. Some clinicians strongly believe that early intervention with functional appliances improves facial harmony and simplifies as well as shortens the second orthodontic treatment phase. In contrast others advocate that it is unnecessary as the early treatment results will be eliminated by future growth and a recurrent treatment phase is essential in the permanent dentition stage in any case. Thus it is merely a waste of time and resources, and all treatment goals could be reached by a comprehensive single continued treatment phase in the late mixed dentition stage. This article summarizes the scientific literature on the different concepts of early functional orthodontic treatment of Skeletal Class II malocclusion correction vs. a single comprehensive orthodontic treatment process in the late mixed dentition stage. The indications and benefits of each of the approaches are discussed in detail. In conclusion, most of the researchers recommend early orthodontic intervention in children suffering psychological and social problems associated with their malocclusion. Prevention of traumatic injury in cases of maxillary incisor protrusive inclination is also considered an indication for early orthodontic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":82453,"journal":{"name":"Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (1993)","volume":"31 1","pages":"25-31, 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (1993)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimal timing for commencement of orthodontic treatment has been controversial. Initial early orthodontic treatment usually begins at the deciduous dentition or early mixed dentition stage and continues for 12-18 months. In most cases, a second treatment phase will be required in the permanent dentition stage to achieve the treatment goals and a stable occlusion. One of the main purposes of the early treatment phase is to affect the growth pattern of the jaw and consequently correct skeletal imbalance and prevent future severe malocclusion by means of growth modification. Some clinicians strongly believe that early intervention with functional appliances improves facial harmony and simplifies as well as shortens the second orthodontic treatment phase. In contrast others advocate that it is unnecessary as the early treatment results will be eliminated by future growth and a recurrent treatment phase is essential in the permanent dentition stage in any case. Thus it is merely a waste of time and resources, and all treatment goals could be reached by a comprehensive single continued treatment phase in the late mixed dentition stage. This article summarizes the scientific literature on the different concepts of early functional orthodontic treatment of Skeletal Class II malocclusion correction vs. a single comprehensive orthodontic treatment process in the late mixed dentition stage. The indications and benefits of each of the approaches are discussed in detail. In conclusion, most of the researchers recommend early orthodontic intervention in children suffering psychological and social problems associated with their malocclusion. Prevention of traumatic injury in cases of maxillary incisor protrusive inclination is also considered an indication for early orthodontic treatment.

[功能矫治器生长抑制的早期正畸治疗——利弊]。
开始正畸治疗的最佳时机一直存在争议。最初的早期正畸治疗通常从乳牙期或早期混合牙期开始,持续12-18个月。在大多数情况下,需要在恒牙列阶段进行第二次治疗,以达到治疗目标和稳定的咬合。早期治疗阶段的主要目的之一是通过生长修饰来影响颌骨的生长模式,从而纠正骨骼失衡,防止未来严重的错颌畸形。一些临床医生强烈认为,早期干预功能器具改善面部和谐,简化和缩短第二正畸治疗阶段。相反,其他人则主张没有必要,因为早期的治疗结果将被未来的生长所消除,并且在任何情况下,在恒牙列阶段复发治疗阶段都是必不可少的。因此,这只是浪费时间和资源,在混合牙列晚期进行全面的单一持续治疗阶段就可以达到所有的治疗目标。本文综述了早期功能正畸治疗骨骼II类错矫治与混合牙列晚期单一综合正畸治疗过程的不同概念的科学文献。详细讨论了每种方法的适应症和益处。总之,大多数研究人员建议对患有与错牙合相关的心理和社会问题的儿童进行早期正畸干预。预防外伤性损伤的情况下,上颌切牙突出倾向也被认为是早期正畸治疗的指征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书