A prospective randomized controlled trial of controlled passive mobilization vs. place and active hold exercises after zone 2 flexor tendon repair.

Maryam Farzad, Fereydoun Layeghi, Ali Asgari, David C Ring, Masoud Karimlou, S Ali Hosseini
{"title":"A prospective randomized controlled trial of controlled passive mobilization vs. place and active hold exercises after zone 2 flexor tendon repair.","authors":"Maryam Farzad,&nbsp;Fereydoun Layeghi,&nbsp;Ali Asgari,&nbsp;David C Ring,&nbsp;Masoud Karimlou,&nbsp;S Ali Hosseini","doi":"10.1142/S0218810414500105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The rehabilitation program after flexor tendon repair of zone II laceration varies. We designed a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of controlled passive mobilization (modified Kleinert) vs. Place and active hold exercises after zone 2-flexor tendon repair by two-strand suture (Modified kessler).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-four fingers in 54 patients with zone 2 flexor tendon modified Kessler repairs were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing place and active hold exercises to controlled passive mobilization (modified Kleinert). The primary outcome measure was total active motion eight weeks after repair as measured by an independent and blinded therapist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with place and active hold exercises had significantly greater total active motion (146) eight weeks after surgery than patients treated with controlled passive mobilization (114) (modified Klinert). There were no ruptures in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Place and hold achieves greater motion than controlled passive mobilization after a two-strand repair for zone 2 flexor tendon repairs.</p>","PeriodicalId":80280,"journal":{"name":"Hand surgery : an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand","volume":"19 1","pages":"53-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S0218810414500105","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand surgery : an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218810414500105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Purpose: The rehabilitation program after flexor tendon repair of zone II laceration varies. We designed a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of controlled passive mobilization (modified Kleinert) vs. Place and active hold exercises after zone 2-flexor tendon repair by two-strand suture (Modified kessler).

Methods: Sixty-four fingers in 54 patients with zone 2 flexor tendon modified Kessler repairs were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing place and active hold exercises to controlled passive mobilization (modified Kleinert). The primary outcome measure was total active motion eight weeks after repair as measured by an independent and blinded therapist.

Results: Patients treated with place and active hold exercises had significantly greater total active motion (146) eight weeks after surgery than patients treated with controlled passive mobilization (114) (modified Klinert). There were no ruptures in either group.

Conclusions: Place and hold achieves greater motion than controlled passive mobilization after a two-strand repair for zone 2 flexor tendon repairs.

一项前瞻性随机对照试验,对照被动活动与2区屈肌腱修复后的位置和主动保持练习。
目的:屈肌腱II区撕裂伤修复后的康复方案不同。我们设计了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,对照受控被动活动(改良Kleinert)与双股缝合(改良kessler)修复2-屈肌腱后的位置和主动保持练习。方法:对54例2区屈肌腱改良Kessler修复术患者的64个手指进行前瞻性随机对照试验,比较放置和主动保持练习与控制被动活动(改良Kleinert)。主要结果测量是修复后8周的总主动运动,由独立的盲法治疗师测量。结果:术后8周,接受放置和主动保持练习的患者的总主动运动(146)明显高于接受控制被动活动(114)的患者(改良Klinert)。两组均未见破裂。结论:在2区屈肌腱修复的双股修复后,放置和保持比控制被动活动获得更大的运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书