A Comparison of Immune Functionality in Viral versus Non-Viral CFS Subtypes.

Nicole Porter, Athena Lerch, Leonard A Jason, Matthew Sorenson, Mary Ann Fletcher, Joshua Herrington
{"title":"A Comparison of Immune Functionality in Viral versus Non-Viral CFS Subtypes.","authors":"Nicole Porter,&nbsp;Athena Lerch,&nbsp;Leonard A Jason,&nbsp;Matthew Sorenson,&nbsp;Mary Ann Fletcher,&nbsp;Joshua Herrington","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Participants with CFS were grouped into viral and non-viral onset fatigue categories and assessed for differential immunological marker expression. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells were assessed for differential phenotypic expression of surface adherence glycoproteins on circulating lymphocytes. The flow cytometric analysis employed fluorescent monoclonal antibody labeling. The viral in comparison to the non-viral group demonstrated significant elevations in several Th1 type subsets including: the percentage and number of CD4+ cells, the percentage and number of CD2+CD26+ cells, the percentage and number of CD2+CD4+CD26+ cells, the percentage and number of CD4+ CD26+ cells, and the percentage of Th2 naïve cells (CD4+ CD45RA+CD62L+). Of the remaining significant findings, the non viral group demonstrated significant elevations in comparison to the viral group for the following Th1 type subsets: the percentage of CD8+ cells, the percentage of T-cytotoxic suppressor cells (CD3+8+), and the percentage and number of Th1 memory cells (CD8+CD45RA-CD62L-). The viral group demonstrated a pattern of activation that differed from that of the group with a non-viral etiology, as evidenced by an elevated and out of range percentage and number of CD4+ cells, the percentage of CD2+CD26+, and the percentage of Th2 naïve cells (CD4+CD45RA+CD62L+). Both groups demonstrated reduced and out of range Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity and percentage of B-1 cells (CD5+CD19). In addition, both groups demonstrated an elevated and out of range percentage of CD2+CD8+CD26+, percentage of the Th1 memory subset (CD4+CD45RA-CD62L-), the percentage of Th1 memory and naïve cells (CD8+CD45RA-CD62L-, CD8+CD45RA+CD62L-), the percentage and number of Th2 memory cells (CD4+CD45RA-CD62L+), and the percentage of Th2 memory and naïve cells (CD8+CD45RA-CD62L+, CD8+CD45RA+CD62L+). These findings imply that the homeostatic mechanism responsible for the regulation of the Th1 (cell mediated) and Th2 (humoral) immune responses is disturbed in CFS. The implications of these findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":89168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of behavioral and neuroscience research","volume":"8 2","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951052/pdf/nihms-470021.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of behavioral and neuroscience research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participants with CFS were grouped into viral and non-viral onset fatigue categories and assessed for differential immunological marker expression. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells were assessed for differential phenotypic expression of surface adherence glycoproteins on circulating lymphocytes. The flow cytometric analysis employed fluorescent monoclonal antibody labeling. The viral in comparison to the non-viral group demonstrated significant elevations in several Th1 type subsets including: the percentage and number of CD4+ cells, the percentage and number of CD2+CD26+ cells, the percentage and number of CD2+CD4+CD26+ cells, the percentage and number of CD4+ CD26+ cells, and the percentage of Th2 naïve cells (CD4+ CD45RA+CD62L+). Of the remaining significant findings, the non viral group demonstrated significant elevations in comparison to the viral group for the following Th1 type subsets: the percentage of CD8+ cells, the percentage of T-cytotoxic suppressor cells (CD3+8+), and the percentage and number of Th1 memory cells (CD8+CD45RA-CD62L-). The viral group demonstrated a pattern of activation that differed from that of the group with a non-viral etiology, as evidenced by an elevated and out of range percentage and number of CD4+ cells, the percentage of CD2+CD26+, and the percentage of Th2 naïve cells (CD4+CD45RA+CD62L+). Both groups demonstrated reduced and out of range Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity and percentage of B-1 cells (CD5+CD19). In addition, both groups demonstrated an elevated and out of range percentage of CD2+CD8+CD26+, percentage of the Th1 memory subset (CD4+CD45RA-CD62L-), the percentage of Th1 memory and naïve cells (CD8+CD45RA-CD62L-, CD8+CD45RA+CD62L-), the percentage and number of Th2 memory cells (CD4+CD45RA-CD62L+), and the percentage of Th2 memory and naïve cells (CD8+CD45RA-CD62L+, CD8+CD45RA+CD62L+). These findings imply that the homeostatic mechanism responsible for the regulation of the Th1 (cell mediated) and Th2 (humoral) immune responses is disturbed in CFS. The implications of these findings are discussed.

病毒性和非病毒性CFS亚型的免疫功能比较
CFS参与者被分为病毒性和非病毒性疲劳类别,并评估差异免疫标志物的表达。评估外周血单核细胞在循环淋巴细胞上表面粘附糖蛋白的差异表型表达。流式细胞分析采用荧光单克隆抗体标记。与非病毒组相比,病毒组在几个Th1型亚群中表现出显著升高,包括:CD4+细胞的百分比和数量,CD2+CD26+细胞的百分比和数量,CD2+CD4+CD26+细胞的百分比和数量,CD4+CD26+细胞的百分比和数量,Th2 naïve细胞的百分比(CD4+ CD45RA+CD62L+)。在其余的重要发现中,与病毒组相比,非病毒组在以下Th1类型亚群中表现出显著的升高:CD8+细胞的百分比,t细胞毒性抑制细胞(CD3+8+)的百分比,以及Th1记忆细胞(CD8+CD45RA-CD62L-)的百分比和数量。病毒组表现出与非病毒病因组不同的激活模式,其证据是CD4+细胞、CD2+CD26+细胞和Th2 naïve细胞(CD4+CD45RA+CD62L+)的百分比和数量升高且超出范围。两组均表现出自然杀伤细胞的细胞毒性和B-1细胞(CD5+CD19)的百分比降低和超出范围。此外,两组均表现出CD2+CD8+CD26+百分比升高和超出范围,Th1记忆亚群百分比(CD4+CD45RA-CD62L-), Th1记忆细胞百分比和naïve细胞(CD8+CD45RA-CD62L-, CD8+CD45RA+CD62L-), Th2记忆细胞百分比和数量(CD4+CD45RA-CD62L+), Th2记忆细胞百分比和naïve细胞(CD8+CD45RA-CD62L+, CD8+CD45RA+CD62L+)。这些发现表明,负责调节Th1(细胞介导)和Th2(体液)免疫反应的稳态机制在CFS中受到干扰。讨论了这些发现的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信