Continuous heliox breathing and the extent of anatomic zone of noreflow and necrosis following ischemia/reperfusion in the rabbit heart.

The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2014-01-24 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874192401408010001
Sharon L Hale, Donald R Vanderipe, Robert A Kloner
{"title":"Continuous heliox breathing and the extent of anatomic zone of noreflow and necrosis following ischemia/reperfusion in the rabbit heart.","authors":"Sharon L Hale,&nbsp;Donald R Vanderipe,&nbsp;Robert A Kloner","doi":"10.2174/1874192401408010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nitrogen may contribute to reperfusion injury. Some studies have shown that helium as a replacement for nitrogen in breathing gas (heliox) reduces cell necrosis after ischemia/reperfusion when used in a preconditioning fashion (intermittent heliox exposure). Our aim was to test whether heliox, breathed continuously throughout the ischemic and reperfusion periods, reduced necrosis and a marker of reperfusion injury, the no-reflow phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Anesthetized, open-chest rabbits received 30 min coronary artery occlusion/3 hrs reperfusion. Before CAO rabbits were randomized to heliox (30% oxygen + 70% helium, n=8) or air supplemented with oxygen to achieve blood gas values within physiologic range (n = 8). Rabbits received the appropriate mix during ischemic and reperfusion periods. Infarct size (% risk zone) and no-reflow defect were measured at the end of the reperfusion period. The ischemic risk zone was similar in both groups (28% of left ventricle in heliox and 29% in control). Heliox breathing did not reduce necrosis; infarct size, expressed as a percentage of the risk region was 44±4% in the heliox group and 49±5% in controls, p = 0.68. The extent of the no-reflow defect was not altered by heliox, either expressed as a percent of the risk region (29±4% in heliox and 28±3% in control) or as a percent of the necrotic zone (65±5% in heliox and 59±8% in control).Heliox treatment had no effect on hemodynamic parameters or arterial blood gas values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuous heliox breathing does not appear to be cardioprotective in the setting of acute myocardial infarction in the rabbit model. Heliox respiration administered during 30 minutes of ischemia and 180 minutes of reperfusion did not alter infarct size or the extent of no-reflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":504447,"journal":{"name":"The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal","volume":"8 ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/ed/TOCMJ-8-1.PMC3937439.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874192401408010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Nitrogen may contribute to reperfusion injury. Some studies have shown that helium as a replacement for nitrogen in breathing gas (heliox) reduces cell necrosis after ischemia/reperfusion when used in a preconditioning fashion (intermittent heliox exposure). Our aim was to test whether heliox, breathed continuously throughout the ischemic and reperfusion periods, reduced necrosis and a marker of reperfusion injury, the no-reflow phenomenon.

Methods and results: Anesthetized, open-chest rabbits received 30 min coronary artery occlusion/3 hrs reperfusion. Before CAO rabbits were randomized to heliox (30% oxygen + 70% helium, n=8) or air supplemented with oxygen to achieve blood gas values within physiologic range (n = 8). Rabbits received the appropriate mix during ischemic and reperfusion periods. Infarct size (% risk zone) and no-reflow defect were measured at the end of the reperfusion period. The ischemic risk zone was similar in both groups (28% of left ventricle in heliox and 29% in control). Heliox breathing did not reduce necrosis; infarct size, expressed as a percentage of the risk region was 44±4% in the heliox group and 49±5% in controls, p = 0.68. The extent of the no-reflow defect was not altered by heliox, either expressed as a percent of the risk region (29±4% in heliox and 28±3% in control) or as a percent of the necrotic zone (65±5% in heliox and 59±8% in control).Heliox treatment had no effect on hemodynamic parameters or arterial blood gas values.

Conclusion: Continuous heliox breathing does not appear to be cardioprotective in the setting of acute myocardial infarction in the rabbit model. Heliox respiration administered during 30 minutes of ischemia and 180 minutes of reperfusion did not alter infarct size or the extent of no-reflow.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

兔心脏缺血再灌注后连续螺旋呼吸与无血流坏死解剖区范围的关系。
背景:氮可能与再灌注损伤有关。一些研究表明,当以预处理方式(间歇性暴露于heliox)使用时,氦气作为呼吸气体(heliox)中氮的替代品可减少缺血/再灌注后的细胞坏死。我们的目的是测试在缺血和再灌注期间连续呼吸的螺旋是否减少了坏死和再灌注损伤的标志,即无回流现象。方法和结果:麻醉开胸兔冠脉闭塞30 min /再灌注3 h。在CAO之前,将家兔随机分为氦氧(30%氧+ 70%氦,n=8)或空气补氧,使血气值在生理范围内(n =8)。家兔在缺血和再灌注期间给予适当的混合。在再灌注期结束时测量梗死面积(%危险区)和无再流缺损。两组的缺血危险区相似(heliox组为28%,对照组为29%)。螺旋呼吸不减少坏死;梗死面积占危险区域的百分比,heliox组为44±4%,对照组为49±5%,p = 0.68。无回流缺陷的程度没有被螺旋瘤改变,要么表示为风险区域的百分比(螺旋瘤为29±4%,对照组为28±3%),要么表示为坏死区域的百分比(螺旋瘤为65±5%,对照组为59±8%)。Heliox治疗对血流动力学参数和动脉血气值无影响。结论:连续螺旋呼吸对兔急性心肌梗死模型无心脏保护作用。在缺血30分钟和再灌注180分钟期间进行螺旋呼吸没有改变梗死面积或无血流的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信