Treatment planning methods in high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy of carcinoma cervix: a dosimetric and radiobiological analysis.

ISRN oncology Pub Date : 2014-01-23 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/125020
Surega Anbumani, Pichandi Anchineyan, Arunainambiraj Narayanasamy, Siddanna R Palled, Sajitha Sathisan, Punitha Jayaraman, Muthu Selvi, Ramesh S Bilimagga
{"title":"Treatment planning methods in high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy of carcinoma cervix: a dosimetric and radiobiological analysis.","authors":"Surega Anbumani,&nbsp;Pichandi Anchineyan,&nbsp;Arunainambiraj Narayanasamy,&nbsp;Siddanna R Palled,&nbsp;Sajitha Sathisan,&nbsp;Punitha Jayaraman,&nbsp;Muthu Selvi,&nbsp;Ramesh S Bilimagga","doi":"10.1155/2014/125020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment planning is a trial and error process that determines optimal dwell times, dose distribution, and loading pattern for high dose rate brachytherapy. Planning systems offer a number of dose calculation methods to either normalize or optimize the radiation dose. Each method has its own characteristics for achieving therapeutic dose to mitigate cancer growth without harming contiguous normal tissues. Our aim is to propose the best suited method for planning interstitial brachytherapy. 40 cervical cancer patients were randomly selected and 5 planning methods were iterated. Graphical optimization was compared with implant geometry and dose point normalization/optimization techniques using dosimetrical and radiobiological plan quality indices retrospectively. Mean tumor control probability was similar in all the methods with no statistical significance. Mean normal tissue complication probability for bladder and rectum is 0.3252 and 0.3126 (P = 0.0001), respectively, in graphical optimized plans compared to other methods. There was no significant correlation found between Conformity Index and tumor control probability when the plans were ranked according to Pearson product moment method (r = -0.120). Graphical optimization can result in maximum sparing of normal tissues. </p>","PeriodicalId":89399,"journal":{"name":"ISRN oncology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"125020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/125020","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/125020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Treatment planning is a trial and error process that determines optimal dwell times, dose distribution, and loading pattern for high dose rate brachytherapy. Planning systems offer a number of dose calculation methods to either normalize or optimize the radiation dose. Each method has its own characteristics for achieving therapeutic dose to mitigate cancer growth without harming contiguous normal tissues. Our aim is to propose the best suited method for planning interstitial brachytherapy. 40 cervical cancer patients were randomly selected and 5 planning methods were iterated. Graphical optimization was compared with implant geometry and dose point normalization/optimization techniques using dosimetrical and radiobiological plan quality indices retrospectively. Mean tumor control probability was similar in all the methods with no statistical significance. Mean normal tissue complication probability for bladder and rectum is 0.3252 and 0.3126 (P = 0.0001), respectively, in graphical optimized plans compared to other methods. There was no significant correlation found between Conformity Index and tumor control probability when the plans were ranked according to Pearson product moment method (r = -0.120). Graphical optimization can result in maximum sparing of normal tissues.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

宫颈癌高剂量率间质性近距离放射治疗的治疗计划方法:剂量学和放射生物学分析。
治疗计划是一个反复试验的过程,它决定了高剂量率近距离治疗的最佳停留时间、剂量分布和负荷模式。计划系统提供了许多剂量计算方法,以使辐射剂量正常化或优化。每种方法都有其自身的特点,以达到治疗剂量,以减轻癌症生长而不损害相邻的正常组织。我们的目的是提出最适合间质性近距离放射治疗计划的方法。随机选取40例宫颈癌患者,迭代5种规划方法。使用剂量测量和放射生物学计划质量指标回顾性比较图形优化与植入物几何和剂量点归一化/优化技术。各方法的平均肿瘤控制概率相似,但无统计学意义。与其他方法相比,图形优化方案膀胱和直肠正常组织并发症的平均概率分别为0.3252和0.3126 (P = 0.0001)。采用Pearson积矩法对方案进行排序时,符合性指数与肿瘤控制概率无显著相关(r = -0.120)。图形优化可以最大限度地保留正常组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信