Li Mai, Ying Yan, Shao-Quan Zhang, Wei-Min Ke, Hong Cao
{"title":"[To investigate the opportunity of entecavir treatment for HBeAg-negative acute-on-chronic liver].","authors":"Li Mai, Ying Yan, Shao-Quan Zhang, Wei-Min Ke, Hong Cao","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore relations between the opportunities and effects of internal general treatment added Entecavir on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B in different score ranges of acute-on-chronic liver failure severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 108 ACLF of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with different ACLF severity score were treated with internal general treatment added Entecavir. The liver failure severity scores, HBV-DNA loads during the initiation of therapy, recovery phase and in deathbed phase, courses of Entecavir administration and mortalities were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 19 patients with high ACLF score (> or = 12), the difference in ACLF score between pre and post-treatment was not significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was not significant and the mortality was 18/19. For 30 patients with higher intermediate ACLF score (8-11), the difference in ACLF score between pre and post-treatment was not significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was significant, and the mortality was 66.67% (20/30). For 36 patients with lower intermediate ACLF score (5-7), the difference in ACLF score between pre and posttreatment was not significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was significant, and the mortality was 30.56% (11/36). For 23 patients with low ACLF score (< or = 4), the difference in ACLF score between pre and post-treatment was significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was significant, and the mortality was 8.70% (2/23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A novel acute-on-chronic liver failure scoring system can syllabify differentiate the relations between the opportunities and efficacies on the Entecavir treatment for HBeAg-negative ACLF.</p>","PeriodicalId":70973,"journal":{"name":"中华实验和临床病毒学杂志","volume":"27 4","pages":"286-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华实验和临床病毒学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore relations between the opportunities and effects of internal general treatment added Entecavir on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B in different score ranges of acute-on-chronic liver failure severity.
Methods: A total of 108 ACLF of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with different ACLF severity score were treated with internal general treatment added Entecavir. The liver failure severity scores, HBV-DNA loads during the initiation of therapy, recovery phase and in deathbed phase, courses of Entecavir administration and mortalities were studied.
Results: For 19 patients with high ACLF score (> or = 12), the difference in ACLF score between pre and post-treatment was not significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was not significant and the mortality was 18/19. For 30 patients with higher intermediate ACLF score (8-11), the difference in ACLF score between pre and post-treatment was not significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was significant, and the mortality was 66.67% (20/30). For 36 patients with lower intermediate ACLF score (5-7), the difference in ACLF score between pre and posttreatment was not significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was significant, and the mortality was 30.56% (11/36). For 23 patients with low ACLF score (< or = 4), the difference in ACLF score between pre and post-treatment was significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was significant, and the mortality was 8.70% (2/23).
Conclusions: A novel acute-on-chronic liver failure scoring system can syllabify differentiate the relations between the opportunities and efficacies on the Entecavir treatment for HBeAg-negative ACLF.