[To investigate the opportunity of entecavir treatment for HBeAg-negative acute-on-chronic liver].

中华实验和临床病毒学杂志 Pub Date : 2013-08-01
Li Mai, Ying Yan, Shao-Quan Zhang, Wei-Min Ke, Hong Cao
{"title":"[To investigate the opportunity of entecavir treatment for HBeAg-negative acute-on-chronic liver].","authors":"Li Mai,&nbsp;Ying Yan,&nbsp;Shao-Quan Zhang,&nbsp;Wei-Min Ke,&nbsp;Hong Cao","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore relations between the opportunities and effects of internal general treatment added Entecavir on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B in different score ranges of acute-on-chronic liver failure severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 108 ACLF of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with different ACLF severity score were treated with internal general treatment added Entecavir. The liver failure severity scores, HBV-DNA loads during the initiation of therapy, recovery phase and in deathbed phase, courses of Entecavir administration and mortalities were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 19 patients with high ACLF score (> or = 12), the difference in ACLF score between pre and post-treatment was not significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was not significant and the mortality was 18/19. For 30 patients with higher intermediate ACLF score (8-11), the difference in ACLF score between pre and post-treatment was not significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was significant, and the mortality was 66.67% (20/30). For 36 patients with lower intermediate ACLF score (5-7), the difference in ACLF score between pre and posttreatment was not significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was significant, and the mortality was 30.56% (11/36). For 23 patients with low ACLF score (< or = 4), the difference in ACLF score between pre and post-treatment was significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was significant, and the mortality was 8.70% (2/23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A novel acute-on-chronic liver failure scoring system can syllabify differentiate the relations between the opportunities and efficacies on the Entecavir treatment for HBeAg-negative ACLF.</p>","PeriodicalId":70973,"journal":{"name":"中华实验和临床病毒学杂志","volume":"27 4","pages":"286-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华实验和临床病毒学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore relations between the opportunities and effects of internal general treatment added Entecavir on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B in different score ranges of acute-on-chronic liver failure severity.

Methods: A total of 108 ACLF of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with different ACLF severity score were treated with internal general treatment added Entecavir. The liver failure severity scores, HBV-DNA loads during the initiation of therapy, recovery phase and in deathbed phase, courses of Entecavir administration and mortalities were studied.

Results: For 19 patients with high ACLF score (> or = 12), the difference in ACLF score between pre and post-treatment was not significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was not significant and the mortality was 18/19. For 30 patients with higher intermediate ACLF score (8-11), the difference in ACLF score between pre and post-treatment was not significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was significant, and the mortality was 66.67% (20/30). For 36 patients with lower intermediate ACLF score (5-7), the difference in ACLF score between pre and posttreatment was not significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was significant, and the mortality was 30.56% (11/36). For 23 patients with low ACLF score (< or = 4), the difference in ACLF score between pre and post-treatment was significant. The difference in HBV-DNA load between pre and post-treatment was significant, and the mortality was 8.70% (2/23).

Conclusions: A novel acute-on-chronic liver failure scoring system can syllabify differentiate the relations between the opportunities and efficacies on the Entecavir treatment for HBeAg-negative ACLF.

[目的探讨恩替卡韦治疗hbeag阴性急慢性肝病的时机]。
目的:探讨内服普通治疗加恩替卡韦治疗hbeag阴性慢性乙型肝炎急性慢性肝衰竭(ACLF)不同程度评分范围的时机与效果的关系。方法:对108例不同ACLF严重程度评分的hbeag阴性慢性乙型肝炎患者进行内科普通治疗加恩替卡韦治疗。研究肝衰竭严重程度评分、治疗开始期、恢复期和临终期HBV-DNA负荷、恩替卡韦疗程和死亡率。结果:19例ACLF评分较高的患者(>或= 12),治疗前后ACLF评分差异无统计学意义。治疗前后HBV-DNA载量差异无统计学意义,死亡率为18/19。30例ACLF中期评分较高的患者(8-11),治疗前后ACLF评分差异无统计学意义。治疗前后HBV-DNA载量差异显著,死亡率为66.67%(20/30)。中低ACLF评分的患者36例(5-7),治疗前后ACLF评分差异无统计学意义。治疗前后HBV-DNA载量差异显著,死亡率为30.56%(11/36)。23例ACLF评分较低(<或= 4)的患者,治疗前后ACLF评分差异有统计学意义。治疗前后HBV-DNA载量差异显著,死亡率为8.70%(2/23)。结论:一种新的急性对慢性肝功能衰竭评分系统可以明确区分恩替卡韦治疗hbeag阴性ACLF的机会和疗效之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4549
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信