Postendodontic restoration: a survey among dentists in Switzerland.

Magdalena Kon, Nicola U Zitzmann, Roland Weiger, Gabriel Krastl
{"title":"Postendodontic restoration: a survey among dentists in Switzerland.","authors":"Magdalena Kon,&nbsp;Nicola U Zitzmann,&nbsp;Roland Weiger,&nbsp;Gabriel Krastl","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the present opinions and the knowledge of Swiss general dentists about current strategies to restore endodontically treated teeth. Between 2009 and 2011, a 17-item questionnaire was given to 95 general dentists at the beginning of continuing education courses related to this topic. The majority of dentists indicated that they restore more than 30 endodontically treated teeth per year. The decision for placing an intracanal post was mainly based on the amount of remaining tooth substance and the type of tooth (anterior tooth, premolar, molar, or abutment for fixed dental prostheses). Most respondents strove for a retention depth of at least two-thirds of the root length and a form-congruent fit between post and post space preparation. In terms of post type, metallic posts were predominantely used, while an increasing application of glass-fiber posts was registered. Regardless of the type of post, composite cements were the most commonly used luting materials. The prevailing strategies for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth are in part in accordance with the current literature. Disagreements with the literature are related to the post length, the desired post fit and the fact that metal screw posts are apparently still in use. </p>","PeriodicalId":74765,"journal":{"name":"Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia","volume":"123 12","pages":"1076-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the present opinions and the knowledge of Swiss general dentists about current strategies to restore endodontically treated teeth. Between 2009 and 2011, a 17-item questionnaire was given to 95 general dentists at the beginning of continuing education courses related to this topic. The majority of dentists indicated that they restore more than 30 endodontically treated teeth per year. The decision for placing an intracanal post was mainly based on the amount of remaining tooth substance and the type of tooth (anterior tooth, premolar, molar, or abutment for fixed dental prostheses). Most respondents strove for a retention depth of at least two-thirds of the root length and a form-congruent fit between post and post space preparation. In terms of post type, metallic posts were predominantely used, while an increasing application of glass-fiber posts was registered. Regardless of the type of post, composite cements were the most commonly used luting materials. The prevailing strategies for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth are in part in accordance with the current literature. Disagreements with the literature are related to the post length, the desired post fit and the fact that metal screw posts are apparently still in use.

牙髓后修复:瑞士牙医调查。
本研究的目的是评估目前的意见和瑞士普通牙医的知识,目前的策略,以恢复根管治疗的牙齿。在2009年至2011年期间,95名全科牙医在开始接受与该主题相关的继续教育课程时收到了一份17项问卷。大多数牙医表示,他们每年修复超过30颗接受过牙髓治疗的牙齿。是否放置管内桩的决定主要基于剩余牙物质的数量和牙齿的类型(固定义齿的前牙、前磨牙、磨牙或基牙)。大多数应答者争取保留深度至少三分之二的根长度和形式一致的贴合之间的岗位和岗位的空间准备。就员额类型而言,主要使用金属员额,玻璃纤维员额的使用也在增加。无论何种类型的桩,复合水泥是最常用的固定材料。普遍的策略,以恢复牙髓治疗的牙齿部分是根据目前的文献。与文献的分歧是有关的桩长度,期望的桩配合和事实,金属螺钉桩显然仍在使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信