Evaluation of a multiplex ELISA for autoantibody profiling in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases.

IF 1.7 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Autoimmune Diseases Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-01-16 DOI:10.1155/2014/896787
Alejandro Caro Pérez, Sarita Kumble, Krishnanand D Kumble, M Consuelo Alonso Cañizal, Luis M Jiménez Jiménez, Lorena Alonso Díez, Pilar Durán Parejo
{"title":"Evaluation of a multiplex ELISA for autoantibody profiling in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases.","authors":"Alejandro Caro Pérez,&nbsp;Sarita Kumble,&nbsp;Krishnanand D Kumble,&nbsp;M Consuelo Alonso Cañizal,&nbsp;Luis M Jiménez Jiménez,&nbsp;Lorena Alonso Díez,&nbsp;Pilar Durán Parejo","doi":"10.1155/2014/896787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The performance of immunoassays for the detection of autoantibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases (ACTD). Our objective was to compare the features of two multiplexed assays-INNO-LIA ANA and Gennova-PictArray ENA ELISA-for measurement of multiple autoantibodies and their utility as a clinical tool in ACTD diagnosis. The antigens included SS-A/Ro (60 and 52), SSB/La, Sm, Sm/RNP, CENP-B, Jo-1, and Scl-70. Stored sera from 85 ACTD patients and 80 controls consisting of patients with vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis and infectious diseases, as well as healthy subjects were analyzed jointly with clinical and laboratory data. Agreement between the two methods varied between 58 and 99% (Cohen's kappa: 0.21-0.71) mostly for SSA and SSB. The frequency of specific autoantibodies measured using the two methods was more variable for SSA, SSB, and RNP/Sm. There were a higher number of ambiguous results when using INNO-LIA. The optimized cut-off values of the Gennova-PictArray resulted in over 99% specificities in samples obtained from the control group. Sensitivity patterns were more accurate in Gennova-PictArray than in INNO-LIA, as suggested in previously reported studies. A third method could be applied to determine which of the two methods is more accurate. </p>","PeriodicalId":46314,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmune Diseases","volume":"2014 ","pages":"896787"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/896787","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmune Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/896787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The performance of immunoassays for the detection of autoantibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases (ACTD). Our objective was to compare the features of two multiplexed assays-INNO-LIA ANA and Gennova-PictArray ENA ELISA-for measurement of multiple autoantibodies and their utility as a clinical tool in ACTD diagnosis. The antigens included SS-A/Ro (60 and 52), SSB/La, Sm, Sm/RNP, CENP-B, Jo-1, and Scl-70. Stored sera from 85 ACTD patients and 80 controls consisting of patients with vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis and infectious diseases, as well as healthy subjects were analyzed jointly with clinical and laboratory data. Agreement between the two methods varied between 58 and 99% (Cohen's kappa: 0.21-0.71) mostly for SSA and SSB. The frequency of specific autoantibodies measured using the two methods was more variable for SSA, SSB, and RNP/Sm. There were a higher number of ambiguous results when using INNO-LIA. The optimized cut-off values of the Gennova-PictArray resulted in over 99% specificities in samples obtained from the control group. Sensitivity patterns were more accurate in Gennova-PictArray than in INNO-LIA, as suggested in previously reported studies. A third method could be applied to determine which of the two methods is more accurate.

Abstract Image

多重ELISA检测自身免疫性结缔组织疾病患者自身抗体谱的评价
检测自身抗体的免疫测定在自身免疫性结缔组织疾病(ACTD)患者的诊断和评估中具有至关重要的意义。我们的目的是比较两种多重检测方法(innoi - lia ANA和Gennova-PictArray ENA elisa)的特征,以测量多种自身抗体及其作为ACTD诊断临床工具的实用性。抗原包括SS-A/Ro(60和52)、SSB/La、Sm、Sm/RNP、CENP-B、Jo-1和Scl-70。对85例ACTD患者和80例对照(血管炎、类风湿关节炎和感染性疾病患者)及健康人的血清进行保存分析,并结合临床和实验室资料进行分析。两种方法之间的一致性在58 - 99%之间(Cohen’s kappa: 0.21-0.71),主要用于SSA和SSB。使用两种方法测量的特异性自身抗体的频率对SSA, SSB和RNP/Sm的变化更大。使用innol - lia时,歧义性结果较多。Gennova-PictArray优化的临界值在对照组获得的样品中产生了超过99%的特异性。正如先前报道的研究表明的那样,genova - pictarray的敏感性模式比ino - lia更准确。第三种方法可以用来确定两种方法中哪一种更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases IMMUNOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信