Primary healthcare solo practices: homogeneous or heterogeneous?

International journal of family medicine Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-01-12 DOI:10.1155/2014/373725
Raynald Pineault, Roxane Borgès Da Silva, Sylvie Provost, Marie-Dominique Beaulieu, Antoine Boivin, Audrey Couture, Alexandre Prud'homme
{"title":"Primary healthcare solo practices: homogeneous or heterogeneous?","authors":"Raynald Pineault, Roxane Borgès Da Silva, Sylvie Provost, Marie-Dominique Beaulieu, Antoine Boivin, Audrey Couture, Alexandre Prud'homme","doi":"10.1155/2014/373725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction. Solo practices have generally been viewed as forming a homogeneous group. However, they may differ on many characteristics. The objective of this paper is to identify different forms of solo practice and to determine the extent to which they are associated with patient experience of care. Methods. Two surveys were carried out in two regions of Quebec in 2010: a telephone survey of 9180 respondents from the general population and a postal survey of 606 primary healthcare (PHC) practices. Data from the two surveys were linked through the respondent's usual source of care. A taxonomy of solo practices was constructed (n = 213), using cluster analysis techniques. Bivariate and multilevel analyses were used to determine the relationship of the taxonomy with patient experience of care. Results. Four models were derived from the taxonomy. Practices in the \"resourceful networked\" model contrast with those of the \"resourceless isolated\" model to the extent that the experience of care reported by their patients is more favorable. Conclusion. Solo practice is not a homogeneous group. The four models identified have different organizational features and their patients' experience of care also differs. Some models seem to offer a better organizational potential in the context of current reforms. </p>","PeriodicalId":89569,"journal":{"name":"International journal of family medicine","volume":"2014 ","pages":"373725"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/373725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Solo practices have generally been viewed as forming a homogeneous group. However, they may differ on many characteristics. The objective of this paper is to identify different forms of solo practice and to determine the extent to which they are associated with patient experience of care. Methods. Two surveys were carried out in two regions of Quebec in 2010: a telephone survey of 9180 respondents from the general population and a postal survey of 606 primary healthcare (PHC) practices. Data from the two surveys were linked through the respondent's usual source of care. A taxonomy of solo practices was constructed (n = 213), using cluster analysis techniques. Bivariate and multilevel analyses were used to determine the relationship of the taxonomy with patient experience of care. Results. Four models were derived from the taxonomy. Practices in the "resourceful networked" model contrast with those of the "resourceless isolated" model to the extent that the experience of care reported by their patients is more favorable. Conclusion. Solo practice is not a homogeneous group. The four models identified have different organizational features and their patients' experience of care also differs. Some models seem to offer a better organizational potential in the context of current reforms.

初级保健个体诊所:同质还是异质?
导言。独奏练习一般被视为一个同质群体。然而,它们在许多特征上可能存在差异。本文旨在识别不同形式的个体诊所,并确定它们与患者就医体验的关联程度。调查方法2010 年在魁北克的两个地区进行了两项调查:一项是针对 9180 名普通人群受访者的电话调查,另一项是针对 606 家初级医疗保健 (PHC) 诊所的邮寄调查。这两项调查的数据通过受访者的惯常医疗来源进行关联。利用聚类分析技术构建了个体诊所分类法(n = 213)。使用二元和多层次分析来确定分类法与患者护理体验之间的关系。结果。从分类法中得出了四个模型。资源丰富的网络化 "模式与 "资源匮乏的孤立化 "模式中的医疗机构形成鲜明对比,后者的患者报告的医疗体验更佳。结论个体诊所并不是一个单一的群体。所确定的四种模式具有不同的组织特征,其病人的护理体验也各不相同。在当前的改革背景下,一些模式似乎具有更好的组织潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书