Preeti Satheesh Kumar, Kumar K S Satheesh, Jins John, Geetha Patil, Ruchi Patel
{"title":"Force transfer and stress distribution in an implant-supported overdenture retained with a hader bar attachment: a finite element analysis.","authors":"Preeti Satheesh Kumar, Kumar K S Satheesh, Jins John, Geetha Patil, Ruchi Patel","doi":"10.1155/2013/369147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and Objectives. A key factor for the long-term function of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. The effect of adding a stiffener to the tissue side of the Hader bar helps to reduce the transmission of the stresses to the alveolar bone. But the ideal thickness of the stiffener to be attached to the bar is a subject of much debate. This study aims to analyze the force transfer and stress distribution of an implant-supported overdenture with a Hader bar attachment. The stiffener of the bar attachments was varied and the stress distribution to the bone around the implant was studied. Methods. A CT scan of edentulous mandible was used and three models with 1, 2, and 3 mm thick stiffeners were created and subjected to loads of emulating the masticatory forces. These different models were analyzed by the Finite Element Software (Ansys, Version 8.0) using von Mises stress analysis. Results. The results showed that the maximum stress concentration was seen in the neck of the implant for models A and B. In model C the maximum stress concentration was in the bar attachment making it the model with the best stress distribution, as far as implant failures are concerned. Conclusion. The implant with Hader bar attachment with a 3 mm stiffener is the best in terms of stress distribution, where the stress is concentrated at the bar and stiffener regions. </p>","PeriodicalId":89396,"journal":{"name":"ISRN dentistry","volume":"2013 ","pages":"369147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/369147","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/369147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
Background and Objectives. A key factor for the long-term function of a dental implant is the manner in which stresses are transferred to the surrounding bone. The effect of adding a stiffener to the tissue side of the Hader bar helps to reduce the transmission of the stresses to the alveolar bone. But the ideal thickness of the stiffener to be attached to the bar is a subject of much debate. This study aims to analyze the force transfer and stress distribution of an implant-supported overdenture with a Hader bar attachment. The stiffener of the bar attachments was varied and the stress distribution to the bone around the implant was studied. Methods. A CT scan of edentulous mandible was used and three models with 1, 2, and 3 mm thick stiffeners were created and subjected to loads of emulating the masticatory forces. These different models were analyzed by the Finite Element Software (Ansys, Version 8.0) using von Mises stress analysis. Results. The results showed that the maximum stress concentration was seen in the neck of the implant for models A and B. In model C the maximum stress concentration was in the bar attachment making it the model with the best stress distribution, as far as implant failures are concerned. Conclusion. The implant with Hader bar attachment with a 3 mm stiffener is the best in terms of stress distribution, where the stress is concentrated at the bar and stiffener regions.
背景和目标。影响牙种植体长期功能的一个关键因素是压力转移到周围骨骼的方式。在Hader杆的组织侧增加一个加强筋的效果有助于减少对牙槽骨的应力传递。但是附加在钢筋上的加强筋的理想厚度是一个有很多争论的话题。本研究旨在分析Hader杆附着体种植覆盖义齿的力传递和应力分布。采用不同的加劲方式,对种植体周围骨的应力分布进行了研究。方法。采用CT扫描对无牙下颌骨进行扫描,建立了3个具有1、2和3 mm厚加强筋的模型,并进行了模拟咀嚼力的加载。采用有限元软件(Ansys, Version 8.0)采用von Mises应力分析法对不同模型进行分析。结果。结果表明,模型A和模型b的应力最大集中在种植体颈部。模型C的应力最大集中在棒体附着处,是种植体失效时应力分布最好的模型。结论。Hader杆附着体加3mm加劲筋的种植体应力分布最好,应力集中在杆和加劲筋区域。