Does the presence of an implant including expander with internal port alter radiation dose? An ex vivo model.

Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1177/229255031302100109
Barbara Strang, Kyla Murphy, Shane Seal, Arianna Dal Cin
{"title":"Does the presence of an implant including expander with internal port alter radiation dose? An ex vivo model.","authors":"Barbara Strang,&nbsp;Kyla Murphy,&nbsp;Shane Seal,&nbsp;Arianna Dal Cin","doi":"10.1177/229255031302100109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of literature examining the dosimetric implications of irradiating breast implants and expanders with internal ports inserted at the time of mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether the presence of breast expanders with port in saline or silicone implants affect the dose uniformity across the breast when irradiated with various photon and electron energies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One tissue-equivalent torso phantom with overlying tissue expanders in saline or silicone implants were irradiated using tangential fields with 6 MV and 18 MV photons and 9 MeV and 12 MeV electrons. All dose measurements were performed using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). The TLDs were arranged around the port and the perimeters of either the expander, or saline or silicone implant. Comparisons of measured radiation doses, and between the expected and measured doses of radiation from the TLDs on each prosthesis, were performed. Data were analyzed using two-tailed t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in TLD measurements between the expander and the saline implant for all energy modalities, and for the expected versus actual measurements for the saline implant. Higher than anticipated measurements were recorded for a significant number of TLD positions around the silicone implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiation doses around saline implants or expanders with internal port were unaltered, whereas dose recordings for silicone implants were higher than predicted in the present laboratory/ex vivo study.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"21 1","pages":"37-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/229255031302100109","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031302100109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of literature examining the dosimetric implications of irradiating breast implants and expanders with internal ports inserted at the time of mastectomy.

Objective: To determine whether the presence of breast expanders with port in saline or silicone implants affect the dose uniformity across the breast when irradiated with various photon and electron energies.

Methods: One tissue-equivalent torso phantom with overlying tissue expanders in saline or silicone implants were irradiated using tangential fields with 6 MV and 18 MV photons and 9 MeV and 12 MeV electrons. All dose measurements were performed using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). The TLDs were arranged around the port and the perimeters of either the expander, or saline or silicone implant. Comparisons of measured radiation doses, and between the expected and measured doses of radiation from the TLDs on each prosthesis, were performed. Data were analyzed using two-tailed t tests.

Results: There were no differences in TLD measurements between the expander and the saline implant for all energy modalities, and for the expected versus actual measurements for the saline implant. Higher than anticipated measurements were recorded for a significant number of TLD positions around the silicone implants.

Conclusions: Radiation doses around saline implants or expanders with internal port were unaltered, whereas dose recordings for silicone implants were higher than predicted in the present laboratory/ex vivo study.

分享
查看原文
带内孔扩张器的植入物是否会改变辐射剂量?离体模型。
背景:在乳房切除术时,有内孔插入的乳房植入物和扩张器照射的剂量学意义缺乏文献研究。目的:探讨在不同光子和电子能量照射下,生理盐水或硅胶植入带孔的乳房扩张器是否会影响乳房的剂量均匀性。方法:在生理盐水或硅胶植入物中,用6 MV和18 MV光子和9 MeV和12 MeV电子的切向场照射一个具有组织等效的躯干假体。所有剂量测量均使用热释光剂量计(TLDs)进行。tld被安排在端口和扩张器,生理盐水或硅胶植入物的周围。比较了测量的辐射剂量,并比较了每个假体的预期辐射剂量和实际辐射剂量。数据分析采用双尾t检验。结果:在所有能量模式下,扩张器和生理盐水植入物的TLD测量值没有差异,生理盐水植入物的预期测量值和实际测量值也没有差异。在硅胶植入物周围的大量TLD位置记录了高于预期的测量结果。结论:生理盐水植入物或内孔扩张器周围的辐射剂量没有改变,而硅胶植入物的剂量记录高于目前实验室/离体研究的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信