Combining multiple clusterings of chemical structures using cluster-based similarity partitioning algorithm.

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Faisal Saeed, Naomie Salim, Ammar Abdo
{"title":"Combining multiple clusterings of chemical structures using cluster-based similarity partitioning algorithm.","authors":"Faisal Saeed,&nbsp;Naomie Salim,&nbsp;Ammar Abdo","doi":"10.1504/IJCBDD.2014.058584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many types of clustering techniques for chemical structures have been used in the literature, but it is known that any single method will not always give the best results for all types of applications. Recent work on consensus clustering methods is motivated because of the successes of combining multiple classifiers in many areas and the ability of consensus clustering to improve the robustness, novelty, consistency and stability of individual clusterings. In this paper, the Cluster-based Similarity Partitioning Algorithm (CSPA) was examined for improving the quality of chemical structures clustering. The effectiveness of clustering was evaluated based on the ability to separate active from inactive molecules in each cluster and the results were compared with the Ward&#39;s clustering method. The chemical dataset MDL Drug Data Report (MDDR) database was used for experiments. The results, obtained by combining multiple clusterings, showed that the consensus clustering method can improve the robustness, novelty and stability of chemical structures clustering. </p>","PeriodicalId":39227,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computational Biology and Drug Design","volume":"7 1","pages":"31-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJCBDD.2014.058584","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computational Biology and Drug Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCBDD.2014.058584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Many types of clustering techniques for chemical structures have been used in the literature, but it is known that any single method will not always give the best results for all types of applications. Recent work on consensus clustering methods is motivated because of the successes of combining multiple classifiers in many areas and the ability of consensus clustering to improve the robustness, novelty, consistency and stability of individual clusterings. In this paper, the Cluster-based Similarity Partitioning Algorithm (CSPA) was examined for improving the quality of chemical structures clustering. The effectiveness of clustering was evaluated based on the ability to separate active from inactive molecules in each cluster and the results were compared with the Ward's clustering method. The chemical dataset MDL Drug Data Report (MDDR) database was used for experiments. The results, obtained by combining multiple clusterings, showed that the consensus clustering method can improve the robustness, novelty and stability of chemical structures clustering.

利用基于聚类的相似性划分算法组合化学结构的多个聚类。
文献中已经使用了许多类型的化学结构聚类技术,但众所周知,任何一种方法都不会总是为所有类型的应用提供最佳结果。由于共识聚类在许多领域成功地结合了多个分类器,并且共识聚类能够提高单个聚类的鲁棒性、新颖性、一致性和稳定性,因此推动了最近对共识聚类方法的研究。本文研究了基于聚类的相似性划分算法(CSPA),以提高化学结构聚类的质量。根据每个聚类中活性分子与非活性分子的分离能力来评估聚类的有效性,并将结果与Ward's聚类方法进行比较。实验使用化学数据集MDL药物数据报告(MDDR)数据库。结果表明,一致聚类方法可以提高化学结构聚类的鲁棒性、新颖性和稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computational Biology and Drug Design
International Journal of Computational Biology and Drug Design Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Drug Discovery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信