Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 6: prevention of healthcare-associated infections).

Barbara Mauger Rothenberg, Anne Marbella, Elizabeth Pines, Ryan Chopra, Edgar R Black, Naomi Aronson
{"title":"Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 6: prevention of healthcare-associated infections).","authors":"Barbara Mauger Rothenberg,&nbsp;Anne Marbella,&nbsp;Elizabeth Pines,&nbsp;Ryan Chopra,&nbsp;Edgar R Black,&nbsp;Naomi Aronson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To update the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence Report Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies: Volume 6-Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infections on quality improvement (QI) strategies to increase adherence to preventive interventions and/or reduce infection rates for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), surgical site infections (SSI), and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, and Embase® were searched from January 2006 to January 2012 for English-language studies with sample size ≥100 patients, a defined baseline period, and reported statistical analysis for adherence and/or infection rates. Articles from the previous report were screened and those meeting selection criteria were included.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>We sought studies that evaluated the following QI strategies to improve adherence to evidence-based preventive interventions and/or reduce healthcare-associated infection (HAI) rates: audit and feedback; financial incentives, regulation, and policy; organizational change; patient education; provider education; and provider reminder systems. Data were abstracted by a single reviewer and fact-checked by a second. Outcomes were adherence to preventive interventions, infection rates, adverse outcomes, and cost savings. Study quality was assessed using relative rankings based on study design, adequacy of statistical analysis, length of followup, reporting and analysis of baseline and postintervention adherence and infection rates, and implementation of the intervention independent of other QI efforts. Combinations of QI strategies were assessed, not individual strategies. Strength of evidence was judged according to the AHRQ Methods Guide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one articles yielded 71 analyses at the infection level, including 9 articles (10 analyses) from the 2007 report, which evaluated the use of one or more QI strategies to improve adherence or infection rates and also controlled for confounding or secular trend. Twenty-six analyses were performed on CLABSI, 19 on VAP, 15 on SSI, and 11 on CAUTI. There were 34 analyses on adherence, of which 31 (91%) showed significant improvement. There were 63 analyses of infection rates, of which 42 (67%) showed significant improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is moderate strength of evidence across all four infections that both adherence and infection rates improve when either audit and feedback plus provider reminder systems or audit and feedback alone is added to the base strategies of organizational change and provider education. There is low strength of evidence that adherence and infection rates improve when provider reminder systems alone are added to the base strategies. There was insufficient evidence for reduction of HAI in nonhospital settings, cost savings for QI strategies, and the nature and impact of the clinical contextual factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72991,"journal":{"name":"Evidence report/technology assessment","volume":" 208.6","pages":"1-578"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence report/technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To update the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence Report Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies: Volume 6-Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infections on quality improvement (QI) strategies to increase adherence to preventive interventions and/or reduce infection rates for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), surgical site infections (SSI), and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI).

Data sources: MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, and Embase® were searched from January 2006 to January 2012 for English-language studies with sample size ≥100 patients, a defined baseline period, and reported statistical analysis for adherence and/or infection rates. Articles from the previous report were screened and those meeting selection criteria were included.

Review methods: We sought studies that evaluated the following QI strategies to improve adherence to evidence-based preventive interventions and/or reduce healthcare-associated infection (HAI) rates: audit and feedback; financial incentives, regulation, and policy; organizational change; patient education; provider education; and provider reminder systems. Data were abstracted by a single reviewer and fact-checked by a second. Outcomes were adherence to preventive interventions, infection rates, adverse outcomes, and cost savings. Study quality was assessed using relative rankings based on study design, adequacy of statistical analysis, length of followup, reporting and analysis of baseline and postintervention adherence and infection rates, and implementation of the intervention independent of other QI efforts. Combinations of QI strategies were assessed, not individual strategies. Strength of evidence was judged according to the AHRQ Methods Guide.

Results: Sixty-one articles yielded 71 analyses at the infection level, including 9 articles (10 analyses) from the 2007 report, which evaluated the use of one or more QI strategies to improve adherence or infection rates and also controlled for confounding or secular trend. Twenty-six analyses were performed on CLABSI, 19 on VAP, 15 on SSI, and 11 on CAUTI. There were 34 analyses on adherence, of which 31 (91%) showed significant improvement. There were 63 analyses of infection rates, of which 42 (67%) showed significant improvement.

Conclusions: There is moderate strength of evidence across all four infections that both adherence and infection rates improve when either audit and feedback plus provider reminder systems or audit and feedback alone is added to the base strategies of organizational change and provider education. There is low strength of evidence that adherence and infection rates improve when provider reminder systems alone are added to the base strategies. There was insufficient evidence for reduction of HAI in nonhospital settings, cost savings for QI strategies, and the nature and impact of the clinical contextual factors.

缩小质量差距:重新审视科学现状(第6卷:预防保健相关感染)。
目的:更新医疗保健研究和质量机构(AHRQ)证据报告,缩小质量差距:对质量改进策略的关键分析;第6卷:预防医疗保健相关感染的质量改进(QI)策略,以增加对预防性干预措施的依从性和/或降低中央静脉相关血流感染(CLABSI)、呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)、手术部位感染(SSI)和导尿管相关尿路感染(CAUTI)的感染率。数据来源:检索MEDLINE®、CINAHL®和Embase®,检索2006年1月至2012年1月样本量≥100例患者的英语研究,确定基线期,并报告依从性和/或感染率的统计分析。对前一份报告中的文章进行了筛选,并列入了符合选择标准的文章。回顾方法:我们寻找评估以下QI策略的研究,以提高对循证预防干预措施的依从性和/或降低医疗保健相关感染(HAI)率:审计和反馈;财政激励、监管和政策;组织变革;病人教育;提供教育;供应商提醒系统。数据由一名审稿人提取,另一名审稿人进行事实核查。结果是预防干预的依从性、感染率、不良后果和成本节约。根据研究设计、统计分析的充分性、随访时间、基线和干预后依从性和感染率的报告和分析,以及独立于其他QI努力的干预措施的实施,使用相对排名来评估研究质量。评估了QI策略的组合,而不是单独的策略。根据AHRQ方法指南判断证据的强度。结果:61篇文章在感染水平上进行了71项分析,其中包括2007年报告中的9篇文章(10项分析),评估了一种或多种QI策略的使用,以提高依从性或感染率,并控制了混杂或长期趋势。CLABSI分析26例,VAP分析19例,SSI分析15例,CAUTI分析11例。34例依从性分析,其中31例(91%)显示显著改善。共有63例感染率分析,其中42例(67%)显示明显改善。结论:在所有四种感染中,有中等强度的证据表明,当审计和反馈加提供者提醒系统或单独审计和反馈加入组织变革和提供者教育的基本策略时,依从性和感染率都有所提高。当提供者提醒系统单独添加到基本策略中时,依从性和感染率得到改善的证据强度很低。没有足够的证据表明在非医院环境中降低HAI、QI策略的成本节约以及临床环境因素的性质和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信