Enabling patient-centered care through health information technology.

Joseph Finkelstein, Amy Knight, Spyridon Marinopoulos, M Christopher Gibbons, Zackary Berger, Hanan Aboumatar, Renee F Wilson, Brandyn D Lau, Ritu Sharma, Eric B Bass
{"title":"Enabling patient-centered care through health information technology.","authors":"Joseph Finkelstein,&nbsp;Amy Knight,&nbsp;Spyridon Marinopoulos,&nbsp;M Christopher Gibbons,&nbsp;Zackary Berger,&nbsp;Hanan Aboumatar,&nbsp;Renee F Wilson,&nbsp;Brandyn D Lau,&nbsp;Ritu Sharma,&nbsp;Eric B Bass","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The main objective of the report is to review the evidence on the impact of health information technology (IT) that supports patient-centered care (PCC) on: health care processes; clinical outcomes; intermediate outcomes (patient or provider satisfaction, health knowledge and behavior, and cost); responsiveness to needs and preferences of patients; shared decisionmaking and patient-clinician communication; and access to information. Additional objectives were to identify barriers and facilitators for using health IT to deliver PCC, and to identify gaps in evidence and information needed by patients, providers, payers, and policymakers.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE®, Embase®, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, INSPEC, and Compendex databases through July 31, 2010.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired members of our team reviewed citations to identify randomized controlled trials of PCC-related health IT interventions and studies that addressed barriers and facilitators for health IT for delivery of PCC. Independent assessors rated studies for quality. Paired reviewers abstracted data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 327 eligible articles, including 184 articles on the impact of health IT applications implemented to support PCC and 206 articles addressing barriers or facilitators for such health IT applications. Sixty-three articles addressed both questions. The study results suggested positive effects of PCC-related health IT interventions on health care process outcomes, disease-specific clinical outcomes (for diabetes mellitus, heart disease, cancer, and other health conditions), intermediate outcomes, responsiveness to the needs and preferences of patients, shared decisionmaking, patient-clinician communication, and access to medical information. Studies reported a number of barriers and facilitators for using health IT applications to enable PCC. Barriers included: lack of usability; problems with access to the health IT application due to older age, low income, education, cognitive impairment, and other factors; low computer literacy in patients and clinicians; insufficient basic formal training in health IT applications; physicians' concerns about more work; workflow issues; problems related to new system implementation, including concerns about confidentiality of patient information; depersonalization; incompatibility with current health care practices; lack of standardization; and problems with reimbursement. Facilitators for the utilization of health IT included ease of use, perceived usefulness, efficiency of use, availability of support, comfort in use, and site location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite marked heterogeneity in study characteristics and quality, substantial evidence exists confirming that health IT applications with PCC-related components have a positive effect on health care outcomes. positive effect on health care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72991,"journal":{"name":"Evidence report/technology assessment","volume":" 206","pages":"1-1531"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4781073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence report/technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The main objective of the report is to review the evidence on the impact of health information technology (IT) that supports patient-centered care (PCC) on: health care processes; clinical outcomes; intermediate outcomes (patient or provider satisfaction, health knowledge and behavior, and cost); responsiveness to needs and preferences of patients; shared decisionmaking and patient-clinician communication; and access to information. Additional objectives were to identify barriers and facilitators for using health IT to deliver PCC, and to identify gaps in evidence and information needed by patients, providers, payers, and policymakers.

Data sources: MEDLINE®, Embase®, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, INSPEC, and Compendex databases through July 31, 2010.

Methods: Paired members of our team reviewed citations to identify randomized controlled trials of PCC-related health IT interventions and studies that addressed barriers and facilitators for health IT for delivery of PCC. Independent assessors rated studies for quality. Paired reviewers abstracted data.

Results: The search identified 327 eligible articles, including 184 articles on the impact of health IT applications implemented to support PCC and 206 articles addressing barriers or facilitators for such health IT applications. Sixty-three articles addressed both questions. The study results suggested positive effects of PCC-related health IT interventions on health care process outcomes, disease-specific clinical outcomes (for diabetes mellitus, heart disease, cancer, and other health conditions), intermediate outcomes, responsiveness to the needs and preferences of patients, shared decisionmaking, patient-clinician communication, and access to medical information. Studies reported a number of barriers and facilitators for using health IT applications to enable PCC. Barriers included: lack of usability; problems with access to the health IT application due to older age, low income, education, cognitive impairment, and other factors; low computer literacy in patients and clinicians; insufficient basic formal training in health IT applications; physicians' concerns about more work; workflow issues; problems related to new system implementation, including concerns about confidentiality of patient information; depersonalization; incompatibility with current health care practices; lack of standardization; and problems with reimbursement. Facilitators for the utilization of health IT included ease of use, perceived usefulness, efficiency of use, availability of support, comfort in use, and site location.

Conclusions: Despite marked heterogeneity in study characteristics and quality, substantial evidence exists confirming that health IT applications with PCC-related components have a positive effect on health care outcomes. positive effect on health care outcomes.

通过卫生信息技术实现以患者为中心的护理。
目标:本报告的主要目标是审查支持以患者为中心的护理的卫生信息技术(IT)对卫生保健过程的影响的证据;临床结果;中间结果(患者或提供者满意度、健康知识和行为以及成本);对病人的需要和偏好作出反应;共同决策和医患沟通;以及获取信息的途径。其他目标是确定使用卫生信息技术提供PCC的障碍和促进因素,并确定患者、提供者、支付方和政策制定者所需的证据和信息方面的差距。数据来源:截至2010年7月31日,MEDLINE®,Embase®,Cochrane图书馆,Scopus,护理和联合健康文献累积索引,PsycINFO, INSPEC和Compendex数据库。方法:我们团队的配对成员回顾了引文,以确定与PCC相关的卫生IT干预措施的随机对照试验,以及解决卫生IT提供PCC的障碍和促进因素的研究。独立评估人员对研究的质量进行评估。成对的审稿人提取数据。结果:检索确定了327篇符合条件的文章,包括184篇关于为支持PCC而实施的卫生IT应用的影响的文章,以及206篇关于此类卫生IT应用的障碍或促进因素的文章。63条涉及这两个问题。研究结果表明,与pcc相关的医疗信息技术干预对医疗保健过程结果、疾病特异性临床结果(糖尿病、心脏病、癌症和其他健康状况)、中间结果、对患者需求和偏好的响应、共同决策、医患沟通和获取医疗信息具有积极影响。研究报告了使用卫生IT应用程序实现PCC的一些障碍和促进因素。障碍包括:缺乏可用性;由于年龄较大、收入较低、受教育程度高、认知障碍和其他因素,在获取医疗信息技术应用方面存在问题;患者和临床医生的计算机水平较低;缺乏卫生信息技术应用方面的基本正规培训;医生对更多工作的担忧;工作流程问题;与新系统实施相关的问题,包括对患者信息保密性的担忧;人格解体;与现行卫生保健做法不相容;缺乏标准化;还有报销问题。促进医疗信息技术使用的因素包括易用性、感知有用性、使用效率、支持的可用性、使用的舒适性和地点。结论:尽管在研究特征和质量上存在显著的异质性,但有大量证据证实,具有pcc相关成分的医疗信息技术应用对医疗保健结果有积极影响。对卫生保健结果产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信