Use of fecal occult blood test in hospitalized patients: survey of physicians practicing in a large central Canadian health region and Canadian gastroenterologists.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Stephen Ip, AbdulRazaq A H Sokoro, Al Buchel, Debrah Wirtzfeld, Gerald Konrad, Tunji Fatoye, Harminder Singh
{"title":"Use of fecal occult blood test in hospitalized patients: survey of physicians practicing in a large central Canadian health region and Canadian gastroenterologists.","authors":"Stephen Ip,&nbsp;AbdulRazaq A H Sokoro,&nbsp;Al Buchel,&nbsp;Debrah Wirtzfeld,&nbsp;Gerald Konrad,&nbsp;Tunji Fatoye,&nbsp;Harminder Singh","doi":"10.1155/2013/816305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) was developed for colorectal cancer screening in the outpatient setting, it continues to be used among hospitalized patients. No previous study has evaluated the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of practicing physicians on the use of FOBT among hospitalized patients and compared practices among physicians with different medical specialty training.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To survey physicians in the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (WRHA) and Canadian gastroenterologists (GIs) on the use of FOBT in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed by e-mail to internists (n=198), emergency medicine (EM) physicians (n=118), general surgeons (n=47) and family medicine (FM) physicians with admitting privileges (n=29) in the WRHA. Canadian GIs were surveyed through the membership database of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) (n=449). The survey included items regarding demographics of the respondents and their current use of FOBT in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rates ranged from 18% among CAG members to 69% among FM physicians in the WRHA. General internal medicine, general surgeon and GI respondents were less likely to order a FOBT and less likely to believe that an FOBT was useful in assessing emergency room or hospitalized patients when compared with FM and EM respondents (P<0.001). The most common indications for ordering a FOBT were black stools and anemia with and without iron deficiency. Two-thirds of EM physicians preferred point-of-care testing rather than laboratory reporting of FOBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present survey suggests that FOBTs are commonly used in hospitals by EM and FM physicians for indications such as anemia and black stools.</p>","PeriodicalId":55285,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"27 12","pages":"711-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/816305","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/816305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Although the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) was developed for colorectal cancer screening in the outpatient setting, it continues to be used among hospitalized patients. No previous study has evaluated the knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of practicing physicians on the use of FOBT among hospitalized patients and compared practices among physicians with different medical specialty training.

Objective: To survey physicians in the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (WRHA) and Canadian gastroenterologists (GIs) on the use of FOBT in hospitals.

Methods: A survey was distributed by e-mail to internists (n=198), emergency medicine (EM) physicians (n=118), general surgeons (n=47) and family medicine (FM) physicians with admitting privileges (n=29) in the WRHA. Canadian GIs were surveyed through the membership database of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) (n=449). The survey included items regarding demographics of the respondents and their current use of FOBT in hospitals.

Results: Response rates ranged from 18% among CAG members to 69% among FM physicians in the WRHA. General internal medicine, general surgeon and GI respondents were less likely to order a FOBT and less likely to believe that an FOBT was useful in assessing emergency room or hospitalized patients when compared with FM and EM respondents (P<0.001). The most common indications for ordering a FOBT were black stools and anemia with and without iron deficiency. Two-thirds of EM physicians preferred point-of-care testing rather than laboratory reporting of FOBT.

Conclusions: The present survey suggests that FOBTs are commonly used in hospitals by EM and FM physicians for indications such as anemia and black stools.

住院患者粪便隐血检查的使用:对加拿大中部大型卫生地区执业医师和加拿大胃肠病学家的调查。
背景:虽然粪便隐血试验(FOBT)是为门诊结肠直肠癌筛查而发展起来的,但它仍在住院患者中使用。以往没有研究评估执业医师对住院患者使用FOBT的知识、信念和态度,也没有研究比较不同医学专业培训医师的做法。目的:调查温尼伯地区卫生局(WRHA)的医生和加拿大胃肠病学家(gi)在医院使用FOBT的情况。方法:通过电子邮件对WRHA内科医师198名、急诊医师118名、普通外科医师47名、家庭医学医师29名进行调查。通过加拿大胃肠病学协会(CAG)会员数据库对加拿大gi进行调查(n=449)。调查内容包括受访者的人口统计资料及其目前在医院使用FOBT的情况。结果:应答率在CAG成员中为18%,在WRHA的FM医生中为69%。与FM和EM受访者相比,普通内科、普通外科和GI受访者不太可能要求FOBT,也不太可能相信FOBT对评估急诊室或住院患者有用(结论:本调查表明,FOBT在医院中被EM和FM医生普遍用于贫血和黑便等指征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of gastroenterology and liver disease - medicine and surgery. The Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is sponsored by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信