New York's Medicare Marketplace: examining new York's Medicare advantage plan landscape in light of payment reform.

Doug Goggin-Callahaan, Joe Baker, Rachel Bennett, Michell Clerk, Eric Hersey, Fred Riccardi, May Torbattejad, Denise Xu
{"title":"New York's Medicare Marketplace: examining new York's Medicare advantage plan landscape in light of payment reform.","authors":"Doug Goggin-Callahaan,&nbsp;Joe Baker,&nbsp;Rachel Bennett,&nbsp;Michell Clerk,&nbsp;Eric Hersey,&nbsp;Fred Riccardi,&nbsp;May Torbattejad,&nbsp;Denise Xu","doi":"10.1891/1521-0987.14.3.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) provided for cost savings in the Medicare program, in part to underwrite coverage expansion to Medicare beneficiaries, to finance new coverage for those not eligible for Medicare, and to strengthen Medicare's financial outlook. One cost-saving measure, a reformulation and reduction in payments to private health insurance plans that provide Medicare benefits through the Medicare Advantage (MA) program, had a sound policy basis but was criticized, particularly by opponents o fthe ACA, as a measure that would lead to increased costs, reductions in benefits, and diminished plan choices to Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in MA plans. Despite dire predictions to this effect, a review of a sample of MA plan offerings in New York State in 2012 shows that Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in such plans did not experience significant benefit reductions or increased costs. While the number of plan offerings decreased, the reduction was mostly caused by the elimination of duplicative plan choices in 2011. Although the MA plan executives we interviewed indicated that further reductions in plan reimbursement in future years-tempered by potential bonus payments for meeting quality and performance metrics-could impact plan costs and benefits, they believed plans will employ a number of strategies to remain in the market and maintain benefciary benefits and cost structures. However, government regulators and consumer advocates will need to examine MA plan offerings in the coming years to determine the efect ofplan reaction to the ACA payments on beneficiaries'costs for coverage and access</p>","PeriodicalId":80262,"journal":{"name":"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care","volume":"14 3","pages":"187-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1891/1521-0987.14.3.187","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/1521-0987.14.3.187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) provided for cost savings in the Medicare program, in part to underwrite coverage expansion to Medicare beneficiaries, to finance new coverage for those not eligible for Medicare, and to strengthen Medicare's financial outlook. One cost-saving measure, a reformulation and reduction in payments to private health insurance plans that provide Medicare benefits through the Medicare Advantage (MA) program, had a sound policy basis but was criticized, particularly by opponents o fthe ACA, as a measure that would lead to increased costs, reductions in benefits, and diminished plan choices to Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in MA plans. Despite dire predictions to this effect, a review of a sample of MA plan offerings in New York State in 2012 shows that Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in such plans did not experience significant benefit reductions or increased costs. While the number of plan offerings decreased, the reduction was mostly caused by the elimination of duplicative plan choices in 2011. Although the MA plan executives we interviewed indicated that further reductions in plan reimbursement in future years-tempered by potential bonus payments for meeting quality and performance metrics-could impact plan costs and benefits, they believed plans will employ a number of strategies to remain in the market and maintain benefciary benefits and cost structures. However, government regulators and consumer advocates will need to examine MA plan offerings in the coming years to determine the efect ofplan reaction to the ACA payments on beneficiaries'costs for coverage and access

纽约的医疗保险市场:根据支付改革审视纽约的医疗保险优势计划。
《患者保护和平价医疗法案》(ACA)规定了医疗保险计划的成本节约,部分原因是为扩大医疗保险受益人的覆盖范围提供担保,为不符合医疗保险资格的人提供新的覆盖范围,并加强医疗保险的财务前景。一项节省成本的措施是,通过医疗保险优势(MA)计划重新制定并减少支付给提供医疗保险福利的私人健康保险计划的费用,这有一个健全的政策基础,但受到批评,特别是ACA的反对者,因为这一措施会导致成本增加,福利减少,并减少参加MA计划的医疗保险受益人的计划选择。尽管对这一结果的可怕预测,2012年对纽约州MA计划提供的样本的回顾显示,参加此类计划的医疗保险受益人并没有经历明显的福利减少或成本增加。虽然计划的数量减少了,但减少的主要原因是2011年取消了重复的计划选择。尽管我们采访的MA计划高管表示,未来几年计划报销的进一步减少可能会影响计划的成本和收益,但他们认为计划将采用一系列策略来保持市场,并保持受益人的福利和成本结构。然而,政府监管机构和消费者权益倡导者将需要在未来几年检查MA计划的产品,以确定计划对ACA支付的反应对受益人的覆盖和访问成本的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信