MRI Characterization of Vascular Spinal Tumors.

Q Medicine
Kenneth S Bode, Kristen E Radcliff, Alexander R Vaccaro
{"title":"MRI Characterization of Vascular Spinal Tumors.","authors":"Kenneth S Bode,&nbsp;Kristen E Radcliff,&nbsp;Alexander R Vaccaro","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000000051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study described practical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics to assist in the identification of these tumors including the corresponding statistics.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Identification of vascular spinal tumors using MRI allows the opportunity for angiography and preoperative embolization (PE) to improve outcomes and decrease hemorrhage. The MRI characterization reliability of these tumors has not been described.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective comparison of 40 patients, at a single institution, with known spinal tumors was conducted with 20 vascular versus 20 nonvascular cases (based on postoperative pathology). Randomized MRI T1 precontrast/postcontrast and T2 images of these tumors were blinded and reviewed by 7 spine surgeons and 5 musculoskeletal radiologists. Four criteria were reviewed: T2 hyperintensity, contrast enhancement, flow voids, and feeding vessels. The clinical relevance was evaluated by asking if the reviewer recommended PE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of each characteristic for surgeons were: T2 hyperintensity (65%, 85%, 75%), contrast enhancement (84%, 38%, 61%), flow voids (42%, 86%, 64%), and feeding vessels (35%, 90%, 63%). The results for the radiologists were: T2 hyperintensity (83%, 61%, 72%), contrast enhancement (87%, 32%, 60%), flow voids (44%, 93%, 69%), and feeding vessels (33%, 93%, 63%). Both the groups had low κ and intraclass correlation values. Review of angiography/PE recommendation showed that both surgeons and radiologists had a false-negative rate of 33%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons and radiologists have similar moderate accuracy of MRI vascularity identification. Radiologists have a higher sensitivity, but lower specificity. Even with simplified, straightforward criteria, the MRI characterization of vascular spinal tumors has low interobserver/intraobserver reliability with a false-negative rate for angiography/PE recommendation of 33%. Angiography may become more standard in the workup of spine tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","volume":"28 10","pages":"E590-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000051","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Study design: Randomized trial.

Objective: This study described practical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics to assist in the identification of these tumors including the corresponding statistics.

Summary of background data: Identification of vascular spinal tumors using MRI allows the opportunity for angiography and preoperative embolization (PE) to improve outcomes and decrease hemorrhage. The MRI characterization reliability of these tumors has not been described.

Materials and methods: A retrospective comparison of 40 patients, at a single institution, with known spinal tumors was conducted with 20 vascular versus 20 nonvascular cases (based on postoperative pathology). Randomized MRI T1 precontrast/postcontrast and T2 images of these tumors were blinded and reviewed by 7 spine surgeons and 5 musculoskeletal radiologists. Four criteria were reviewed: T2 hyperintensity, contrast enhancement, flow voids, and feeding vessels. The clinical relevance was evaluated by asking if the reviewer recommended PE.

Results: The specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of each characteristic for surgeons were: T2 hyperintensity (65%, 85%, 75%), contrast enhancement (84%, 38%, 61%), flow voids (42%, 86%, 64%), and feeding vessels (35%, 90%, 63%). The results for the radiologists were: T2 hyperintensity (83%, 61%, 72%), contrast enhancement (87%, 32%, 60%), flow voids (44%, 93%, 69%), and feeding vessels (33%, 93%, 63%). Both the groups had low κ and intraclass correlation values. Review of angiography/PE recommendation showed that both surgeons and radiologists had a false-negative rate of 33%.

Conclusions: Surgeons and radiologists have similar moderate accuracy of MRI vascularity identification. Radiologists have a higher sensitivity, but lower specificity. Even with simplified, straightforward criteria, the MRI characterization of vascular spinal tumors has low interobserver/intraobserver reliability with a false-negative rate for angiography/PE recommendation of 33%. Angiography may become more standard in the workup of spine tumors.

血管性脊柱肿瘤的MRI表征。
研究设计:随机试验。目的:本研究描述了实用的磁共振成像(MRI)特征,以协助识别这些肿瘤,包括相应的统计数据。背景资料总结:利用MRI识别血管性脊柱肿瘤,为血管造影和术前栓塞(PE)提供了改善预后和减少出血的机会。这些肿瘤的MRI表征可靠性尚未得到描述。材料和方法:回顾性比较了同一机构40例已知脊柱肿瘤患者,其中20例为血管肿瘤,20例为非血管肿瘤(基于术后病理)。7名脊柱外科医生和5名肌肉骨骼放射科医生对这些肿瘤的随机MRI T1对比前/对比后和T2图像进行盲法分析。回顾了四项标准:T2高强度,对比增强,血流空洞和供血血管。通过询问审稿人是否推荐PE来评估临床相关性。结果:各特征对外科医生的特异性、敏感性和准确性分别为:T2高信号(65%、85%、75%)、对比增强(84%、38%、61%)、血流空隙(42%、86%、64%)和供血血管(35%、90%、63%)。放射科医生的结果为:T2高信号(83%,61%,72%),对比增强(87%,32%,60%),血流空隙(44%,93%,69%)和供血血管(33%,93%,63%)。两组的κ值和类内相关值均较低。回顾血管造影/PE推荐,外科医生和放射科医生的假阴性率均为33%。结论:外科医生和放射科医生在MRI血管识别方面具有相似的中等准确性。放射科医生的敏感度较高,但特异性较低。即使采用简化、直接的标准,椎管性肿瘤的MRI表征在观察者之间/观察者内部的可靠性也很低,血管造影/PE推荐的假阴性率为33%。血管造影可能成为脊柱肿瘤检查的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.16
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques features peer-reviewed original articles on diagnosis, management, and surgery for spinal problems. Topics include degenerative disorders, spinal trauma, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, metastatic tumor spinal replacements, management of pain syndromes, and the use of imaging techniques in evaluating lumbar spine disorder. The journal also presents thoroughly documented case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信