Stent fracture in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries: literature summary and economic impacts.

Nancy Neil
{"title":"Stent fracture in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries: literature summary and economic impacts.","authors":"Nancy Neil","doi":"10.1177/1531003513509122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarize available evidence regarding stent fracture in the femoropopliteal region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, 2000-2011, using MeSH search terms \"stents,\" \"popliteal artery,\" and \"femoral artery.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 29 original studies reporting 0% to 65% incidence of stent fracture. Fracture-related repeat revascularization could be avoided in the absence of device failure. Recently published data suggest that even a 5% rate of fracture-related reintervention would generate $118.4 million in health care cost in the United States. These excess procedures would also result in major complications and deaths that might have been avoided in the absence of stent fracture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reported incidence and clinical relevance of femoropopliteal stent fractures vary across studies. Stent fracture may lead to repeat revascularization. These reinterventions create considerable--and potentially avoidable--economic burden for patients and payers. Further, these costs are effectively invisible wherever stent fractures are not systematically documented as the reason for reintervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":87201,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy","volume":"25 1-2","pages":"20-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1531003513509122","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1531003513509122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Objectives: To summarize available evidence regarding stent fracture in the femoropopliteal region.

Methods: We searched PubMed, 2000-2011, using MeSH search terms "stents," "popliteal artery," and "femoral artery."

Results: We identified 29 original studies reporting 0% to 65% incidence of stent fracture. Fracture-related repeat revascularization could be avoided in the absence of device failure. Recently published data suggest that even a 5% rate of fracture-related reintervention would generate $118.4 million in health care cost in the United States. These excess procedures would also result in major complications and deaths that might have been avoided in the absence of stent fracture.

Conclusions: Reported incidence and clinical relevance of femoropopliteal stent fractures vary across studies. Stent fracture may lead to repeat revascularization. These reinterventions create considerable--and potentially avoidable--economic burden for patients and payers. Further, these costs are effectively invisible wherever stent fractures are not systematically documented as the reason for reintervention.

股浅动脉和腘动脉近端支架骨折:文献综述和经济影响。
目的:总结有关股腘区支架骨折的现有证据。方法:我们检索PubMed, 2000-2011,使用MeSH检索词“支架”、“腘动脉”和“股动脉”。结果:我们确定了29项原始研究,报告了0%至65%的支架骨折发生率。在没有器械失效的情况下,可以避免骨折相关的重复血运重建术。最近公布的数据显示,在美国,即使是5%的骨折相关再干预也会产生1.184亿美元的医疗费用。这些多余的手术也会导致严重的并发症和死亡,如果没有支架骨折,这些并发症和死亡是可以避免的。结论:各研究报告的股腘支架骨折发生率和临床相关性各不相同。支架断裂可能导致重复血运重建。这些再干预措施给患者和支付方造成了相当大的(但可能是可以避免的)经济负担。此外,如果支架骨折没有被系统地记录为再次介入的原因,这些成本实际上是不可见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信